High Court Karnataka High Court

Y M Nanjundappa S/O Late Marigaiah … vs The State Of Karnataka Dept Of … on 9 July, 2009

Karnataka High Court
Y M Nanjundappa S/O Late Marigaiah … vs The State Of Karnataka Dept Of … on 9 July, 2009
Author: Ram Mohan Reddy
:15: 'THE HIGH com? or KA.Rl'¢'ATAI(A., f 

DATED THIS THE 91% DAY or   _ L

BEFORE 

TI-IE HOITBLE MR. JUSTICE   V

WI-'u'T£:PETITION r«Ic;;_».,_;,.s  
msc.w.633g or  ~__;;_1§§ w,g;_;:I¢;:.:,;_$%1 1 o_1;;zoos

BETWEEN H
1 3' M NANJ;UN.F_}1'.PPA--_ 3;'-.G"LA""FE M;a52.I.as«A1AH :32;
MARIYA}*FA  'V      .
AGED i'zB€>_;  52"-YEARS,' F.G~R1§2ULTURAL
LABQURE'-.R;' Ry; 1»1U3_i,;RJ3L3RiV_ 
YEMMEflQ5DDI3"fV}"L_LA§}E .
KA':;:U§2-TAL-'UiI~;:._,  _ '  '  ' -
CH1'i<AMAGALvE_us:: 1:s.1_S-';f1§.,--=c:'I*

:2 Y M MAI~«L,JA;3I?A--_s/-Q :;A'rE MARIGAIAH
FECUSE Nc:».1_4?/62,. A/A 52 YRS
j'P§€US._LA?_UR YEr¢M.I::D1 VILLAGE:
, 'ié;AD%;;2_'1*ALU:<
€Hi§_§AMAG:%LURE 31s'I'R1crr.  PETITIDNERS.

(B3;-+§r::;' cHAfi3;3§:AsHEKAR RODNAVAR, Ami;

 -AND: 

1* V' "  " * 'I'.H:3 S*:'ATE or? KARNATAKA DEPT' OF' RURAL

" :2 THE DEPUTY COMMISSIQNER 

= ..D_E.iVELGPMENT
 AND PANCHAYATH RAJYA
 vmnarm SOUDHA

BANGALORE BY yrs; SECRETARY



CHIKKAMAGALURE} DIS'TR§C'¥'
CI~i££{KAMAGALURE

3 THE SECRETARY   
J§LLAPANCH.AYAT§£  V
CHIKKAMAGALURE BISTE.'ICI'"~ 
CHIKKAMAGALURE

4 THE SECRETARY
TALUKA PANCHAYATH
KADUR TALUK, KABUR

5 THE SECRETARY    
GRAMA PAN(L_HAYATH-.O:¥' MIJSLAP-aka"
YEMMEDQDDI'--VIL§LA{}E ;    
OF KADUf§T2§LUK,V  _  ";';';'REsP0ND;-mws.

(By 321. R. D§§§'A}j1'«?gS,AG§--Vi5r;§:R'1'I;i§)VR5)
TEES xz..r§<r1? Fmso UNDER ARTICLES 225

Am) 227 C3I~'?;' "FI-IE r:t}'1~i3ri*'P~Ij't*iU<}NE;3 "NOTICE ISSUED BY THE RS

v,4.--vvsoU«:;»»:+i'fi'  EXP_LA,.P4'ATIGN 09' PEZTITIGNER VIBE
'<.,ANN;::xu§§?E' .€fs{"~..AND H 3*}: 19.200? AND 16.1.2008

§E:S'Ia%f§t£*:r:i;E:;:9}  . , V 

MIsC;:;W-.é382/ 2099 IS FILED UNSER QRDER 1 RULE

 '.;§ -._1'a.;2) 0;?' .%;§§1'E CPO Ram wrm ARTICLE 22? OF' THE
  C{}P§ST§TUTION 0;: INSIA PRAYENG TO IMPLEAD THE
__5.PFI.JCANTS as RESPONDENTS 6 AND 7 IN THE PETITIGN.

' THIS PETI'I'iDN AND MISC.W., COMING ON FOR

n .uC'RDERS, THIS BAY THE COURT MASH; THE FOLLOWIRG :
€'x -*.

;.
£5.

$1:
/J \



ORDER

Petitioners Cannot be aggrieved by the ,4

Axmexuzes *6″ ané “H” since T3316 Grama M

has only called upon the mt.i£:1cf.1’2o1’s4 .1}ofl

explanation as to Why action {,a1<onD i:o»:V"

forfeit the properties which Vw*ofoo»notV. a.11o2tto_ki iihom.
Even according to leariiéd 'ooimsel, Grama
PaI2<:hay'ath has not conolndoci Vfiie and no

order is passed.' 'i..:E;"erenlA_ac®I*ding' to.' petitioner, the

Work of:._er*eo'{in§.;._-.::1;e3V.§:owj¢2*.in the premises is completed

and n0tI'1i11gE"1o1rtii€:r '£0 be done and it is only an

Airtoi gvioosoe {who to undertake furthor work over

ifiifiofi 'r11E: 'potif,ioners have no control. if the petitioners

are, isstio-d:""'£&?9itfiVv' order in the said proceedings and if

_aggrié:ved_;' question the some in an appropriato

H H " procooding before a. competent court of law.

_' nPo"t_iV'tio:'i is accoréin roasted. 5
» J NF.

at

E. E
‘–../

In View ef the rejection of the writ p<':¥Zit;§£)3'T'?g,_; "

titcmszaquence, Misc. W6382/2009 stands %

KS