IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
ITA.No. 398 of 2009()
1. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,
... Petitioner
Vs
1. M/S.VYAPARAVIJAYAM TRADERS & AGENCIES(P)
... Respondent
For Petitioner :SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAX
For Respondent : No Appearance
The Hon'ble MR. Justice C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR
The Hon'ble MR. Justice C.K.ABDUL REHIM
Dated :09/07/2009
O R D E R
C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR &
C.K.ABDUL REHIM, JJ.
....................................................................
I.T. Appeal No.398 of 2009
....................................................................
Dated this the 9th day of July, 2009.
JUDGMENT
Ramachandran Nair, J.
Of the four questions raised by the Revenue in the appeal filed by
them, first three are covered by our decision in COMMISSIONER OF
INCOME-TAX V. KERALA STATE FINANCIAL ENTERPRISES LTD.
reported in 220 CTR 286. Following the said judgment, we allow the
appeal by reversing the orders of the Tribunal and that of the first appellate
authority with direction to the Assessing Officer to compute tax on interest
received on hire charges and finance charges based on the abovereferred
judgment after issuing notice to the assessee and after giving an opportunity
to the assessee.
2. So far as the last question is concerned, we do not think investment
in Kisan Vikas Patra is a loan or advance that attracts provisions of the
Interest Tax Act. Consequently this issue is decided against the Revenue.
The appeal is disposed of without issuing notice to the assessee only
2
to avoid further expenditure for them. However, the Assessing Officer will
issue a copy of the judgment to the assessee before initiating proceedings
for revision of assessment in terms of the judgment.
C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR
Judge
C.K.ABDUL REHIM
Judge
pms