Karnataka High Court
Sri Gururaja Chathra S/O … vs K Chandrakantha Kini on 7 August, 2009
udupi
Represented by its Branch ?~iana__ger.._
(By Sré.Arun Permappa far R3.)
_ ' « re.$s:F€i§$;b_§.:§;*;99fs;
'ms MFA as $11.53 UN'f§ER_ ssmmt 1T*.:%:{v::.%;..g;s..5:v§x:
ACT, AGAINST THE 3uDGME'¥¢.ir-AND *.¢.wA.E;5";aATED:
85.012606 PASSED EN MVC NQ_."2,0£Qf290$«Q}'¢ 'i_"If~%E FILE
OF CIVIL RIDGE (Sm, MEVMBEL-R4 'Am Amt MACT,
KUNQAPURA, PARTLY 5-\3;.L{3WINi:-.;;THE..C~LA1M PETZTIGEE
FOR COMPENSATION AND1VSEEKiN{3._'£E!%i~H§s.NCEMENT OF'
CQMPENSATIGN.--- *
This a;3.g:n%:ai Q}: _:far.._.E9:é3'-a'£*§:ig"'si¥':E$ day, 318 CGW1
éeiivered the fojiezzytéingr, .
Pet':t;g:zar '¥sf=tVh's:.~=, a:.§§f;--s§"E4E'é'§3t. we mzoasfzeaa fiieé
by hyiérgri '12:2.der.VS'<e;;_'§§b1:3 1 €S6.of the Indian Mater Vehicées Act.
the raspenéents fa?' awarding af
€:;3¥¥?';:eJé1s»a7'%~§.§nf.T%'n""respect &f the injuries sustained Era the
_ §"¥":0t€5--§" xs.gr§?%étAE4§éAa£c§éent which occurreé erg i'.?.§.2§§8 as";
V .éc<:V§§.5s3.t"af actiename negiigence air: tha part 9'? the drévez'
. o€ §§':::' geods tempo bearing Registration N6. KA-28~41?6,,
-»§':a(§s men aiéeweé in part and compensatiere af Rs.83,25B;'-
A ' wéth interest at §% p.a. frem the ate ef aaém petition tifi
the date of fiepesét, has been awarded. if:-ssatisfied with
the award 9? Meter Accifierat Ciaéms Tribunaa .
has been prefarred far increasa.
2, Finding of the triVbunaE'.__t§:--.é_fi tI9é';:._»_ 'pet§t§t§'ié*e.f'~
sustained injuries on account"'*vL.L:c:::fiif*.theV. a":";c) _:'esé.¥:§'.,,,7,v;§:V<'V.'i<ViViagent
which was due to actiosgaijgie of the
driver of the said offend;n:g.'égéh'%a;i<é he is entitied
ta the com;3e§rzs§:§iL§;sn has not
baen questi%i34i§'éT§i'-.$3?'ffié":--ff§.$;,§¢':§--Q_:§:§%1€fé§ts.;There Es rae£t_i':er an
appea% ?;}'1 e';':"i'i Hence, the erfiy pcfint
fa r cen<.§id&e'fé;t¥c:V§ : . '
%._!si¥*:et'i1L"e-."1.a? the:Va._rh(;:§§:1t"'»Lawaréed by the tribunai is
.. «.ijzést~ cem;§e'r3V$a_§E_§:Ar;?
,3,-.._vH$af d"v§§':e iearned counsei on both sides and
$er}{1'sac%u 'tfié"Ljré§:.é fd .
4;;$'et:t:ener has depesed as PW'.1. Ems is the
A 51%;-§.;;:gs_:;:9":"a;*$ certificate which reveais that, there was fracture of
s!rViTaft of right tibia ané fibuifa. PW} whe treated the
getitioner has deposed regarding the injuries sustained by
the petitioner in the road traffic accifirtt and the
«X
,
lccnsecguentéai treatment. The sum award_eé§W"'Ei~;%fj----:i;i;.é=a____"_
tribunai under the heads, cenveyangg, atte:§dar{t».§-ofL_§;3%e§%€ffsé;:;1fV:336 must have
empieyed an att§€z<;i__ant,, 'Et"v§é'§2i§' j":¥?§t €§i.V,"3';»4ard a_fu:'tfier
sum of
5._'?he_'V"a.:;idp§3;}_t._" the head, Ems of
§nco¥r:e ...;dur£r::;A_V}V fh§-..§e;'§v'€:zg_:"a3f'tieatment, is an the Eewer
giée. ?etiE'iQ_;:ie'H;f 'ééé'a_§é}'3" §§_+fiat§ent ané after digcharge, he
?2as,.t¥§%;e:a treétméfit #3 an out -= patiant. .'¥':'i'm2na§ E1a$
§a}<;«ef; §r3%E<s:..;;«s:sVA§'§':*siQerat§0n the actuai period spent, when the
L}'p'£2tfE'%ii_§2«r:ue{'r*:'AV'ié¢a;s;$3E inpatient am has awaréed Rs.§,8fiS;'»-.
V . Petéiéicfgza-:9: .c'c,s€§¥§ mt have atterafieé ta big jefi émmadéateiy
VL..:{a:':$£a:4_dEs§}é'?farge. Even after fiischarge, he must have takers
éi'.!:e'fasiiE a further gerioé 5? {me month to recever faify and
T 'i'e' attémi ta ms werk, Hence, be $5 erztitied ta an
A. additézmaé sum of Rs.3,${)§/- thereunder.
¥/
1,-
In the resuit, the appeaé is afiewad
mociifécatierz of tha Judgment and Award "
Acciéent Céaims Tribzmai, the a9§é2:¥'iar3:jt:_'%'f::j'. h'e;i€§4.A.e逧t»i*ez.§ §;sg '
adéitieaa! cemperssation of Pgs.24;3,flQ:€}.:_' ¥"*whicThv"'*%sV§§é§4§vEA. c§;rf;?
Enterest at 6% p.a. fram me §i"'a't:e af péiitééfi i:i%¥ ':§epcs§t.
3"' respondent/insurance Ce'"'m§§an~f__§;.f;i-aii" {je,§§<:»§t the
enhanced cempensatiofi §~ma-ah?” :¥{itEV1f A’Efr :t§r est«.:..AV’¥’h£e the
Motar Acciéent Clavéffifi1§%T§:’bU’fi:$§_é_.§.«’.%.§_t??§_?3£3′ fifiéhths frsm
today. Ne
The amé:2fit«. #3 «ha reieasfi :9 the
appeiiant. V
§};@Ai_s;£:*3r_v;i%:§A.d;:jé’s.%;V the mecfiféeé award.
501/ –
JUDGE *”