Sushma Chauhan And Another vs State Of Punjab And Another on 22 April, 2009

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

                              Crl.M. No. M-10792 of 2009
                              Date of decision : 22.4.2009.
                             ...

    Sushma Chauhan and another
                                              ................ Petitioners
                             vs.

    State of Punjab and another
                                            .................Respondents


    Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice K.C. Puri

    Present: Sh. Gaurav Sharma, Advocate for the petitioners.
                 ...

    K.C. Puri, J. (Oral)

As per allegation of the prosecution, petitioners executed

agreement to sell in favour of the complainant but prior to that they

have already sold the land to one Asha Rani. So, prima facie the

ingredients of offence under Section 420 IPC are made out.

Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that in the

written statement, the stand has been taken that no agreement has

been executed and the land has already been sold. So, case for

quashing is made out.

I have carefully considered the said submission but do not

find any force in that submission. It is the matter of evidence whether

the alleged agreement is forged, as alleged by the petitioners.

So, no ground for interference under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is

made out.

The petition stands dismissed.

( K.C. Puri )
22.4.2009. Judge
chugh