High Court Kerala High Court

K.S.Raju vs Circle Inspector Of Police on 11 March, 2008

Kerala High Court
K.S.Raju vs Circle Inspector Of Police on 11 March, 2008
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Bail Appl No. 1534 of 2008()


1. K.S.RAJU, SWATHI HOUSE,
                      ...  Petitioner
2. TARO JOSEPH, KIZHEKKEMURI HOUSE,
3. ANILKUMAR P.BABY,
4. SAMBASIVAN.C.K., LALA BHAVAN,
5. M.T.THOMAS, MUNDUVELIKUNNEL HOUSE

                        Vs



1. CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE,
                       ...       Respondent

                For Petitioner  :SRI.M.P.MADHAVANKUTTY

                For Respondent  :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The Hon'ble MR. Justice R.BASANT

 Dated :11/03/2008

 O R D E R
                            R.BASANT, J.
                         ----------------------
                         B.A.No.1534 of 2008
                     ----------------------------------------
          Dated this the 11th day of March 2008

                                O R D E R

Application for anticipatory bail. Petitioners have come to

this court earlier claiming anticipatory bail and by order dated

8/2/2008 in B.A.Nos.677 and 770 of 2008, their application for

anticipatory bail was dismissed with the observation that they

must surrender and seek regular bail. The petitioners had

surrendered and sought regular bail. They have been released

on bail in crime No.25/08 of Changanachery police station in

which anticipatory bail was sought. They have also been

released in three other cases also in which they were arrayed as

accused.

2. The petitioners now apprehend that they may be

arrayed as accused in more cases and subjected to vexation of

arrest and detention.

3. The learned Public Prosecutor, after taking

instructions, submits that the petitioners are not required to be

arrested in any pending crime pending before the respondent.

The petitioners shall not be arrested in respect of any such crime

registered till this date, submits the learned Public Prosecutor.

B.A.No./08 2

4. In the light of the submissions of the learned Public

Prosecutor, the apprehension of the petitioners is found to be

without any basis or merit.

5. This petition is accordingly dismissed accepting the

submissions/undertaking of the learned Public Prosecutor.

(R.BASANT, JUDGE)
jsr

B.A.No./08 3

R.BASANT, J.

CRL.M.CNo.

ORDER

21ST DAY OF MAY2007