High Court Karnataka High Court

Sri Mohan vs Deputy Commissioner Gulbarga … on 11 March, 2008

Karnataka High Court
Sri Mohan vs Deputy Commissioner Gulbarga … on 11 March, 2008
Author: Ajit J Gunjal
CID 0Ih"PII !I'l'l"I'I'1 I flflffljlflfi AIEAIREAI 35$

us u1n- mu CUJRTW xinnunnnnn Ill. lll|.l.I\.Ifll.d'U'fl.l'c
DRIED THIS TEE 10" IIHY OF MRRCH 
nzmnr. %   

'11-m HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE   T  & 

u:1:m~nIr.'rrnn1I 1w.._v2*:?:-*ifiV£'iia* e2nrmI7,   

nioé Ihauan-Le-.     
Sy.!ln.23, 111 a2rs:a,m;, % j   _ 

Ilfifln '..W'I 'J76 .
NIH. nwmrl 5, Irlq'

Gadwal Road.        4 =~-     ;

fiepruoa:r1tca-;i:'v:_xfitni%'i:nger_  1  mfifififsfi
   %

Rfldefif 4' % IiGfifi;1'?¢!i01IlI1'.   .

;'%e'g)i'aiaz11;afi 'u'n"r:-,r', i'*-*.s!'m -3:.

'-1£IVA_.._' 1"-'.91.'! V '

 ;:sn'n;m..':.

 

 %%G.ch.w%  ' nan £91-R2].

~   any is "led - nan _n..-.-g 22;: gm ms: eftl.-.2

 AA .-__Cnz 1M.:ituti::n of India pa-nyirq in direct tho ruspondnntu
' V.  issue npeoini 'Lioanneuja 7'2-it oftho e1':'":.

"l'h'I'W.Pcn:m'ng

Ann: Irhn, ('nu-uni small: 9-
V-5".' 'mi 1

Iain}, use

on lhr
$11..-'9'-.:"=-:



m.H.K. , lanrnnd  'n
directed no make notion for mopon§§§.£'

2. Evan drug' _iIi"fil_1:udvi'A:i:?Avp1ahm:nnryv ' '
haarim,     P.KaJnnoor.

m.-mm         mm T mmi
 1 am! 2, the matter
in  up 'fer: 

   fifiwifi was fu'i"Iu':m'ari iii'w.ur""'

 pcoeauim. rice. para boilnd rice and broknn

 *  19.07.2005. Sufina is-. no say am than first

'l;vuI-:1 -Iv-vial  nmflnr 1'I".'_rfit fin 'H 991 

'E u..|M.u.5umu

'M if OUTjITj fifi Til '9?

ncooniingIaowhichti:epohcyai'p'tinnoi':'|i"nn's'3

can an the flood prooeuirg industries was brought"
-//11/7
./ ' -



aiaout. fine petitioner   the  ox
rulptmdenus 1 and 2 inW.P.lIo.17'95BI2007  Ear
a direction to them to ham market 
carfificlte to the indunugr as per than  

LIX '|arU'|al.llq wauw illllllwiflll-Q his llllfiir  rug.-vr

opinion that um--raw  
APMC Act. in raquimi. mm ifimm. mm.
the quantinn of   not iris.
31.1.1

.1 to obtain
:4) offieotion 65 of the
i order. Pursuant in thin,
the applioaflon. copies of which

rwnnahnrihnol ‘.” lI’_¥._ and (1-. Thu a1-hung; 9!

p:Ip_.?Iu’Iul’ V an-In ‘ u—u–u —n -u-u–u -.—-ww—-

I__A_I____

LA “9 that. apphunuonu

mud»: on m.12.2uo7, the town!

in not processing the name.

.1 I’.l’….I…– annual in Man Inn} 0-Inn!» nI1aIInI1n1I|f in I’ A
‘T: .l.1iH»Vil.I.’ I-Wlil IN HIV IE-Vb lnlullllr lib!-I-Illoliuulian Ina uav

order panned by Court in “fi.F.io.i’7§53ififii’.i7, tin
petitiunar having made an application hr grant of/n

‘Wit

6/

4uA__n_-n 1!_..__.-, L-_…l__. (I__.Ll_-_ fill -10 4.1.- .I…|. .51….
apwimlmmmeuunuawuon IAHOIUJDHOI, U19

second reopondnntis required to aonsidnr in
aooordanoowithluw. V %%

R..*.$…-‘i .

-3
II
B’
I
3′

er

reupncnuon’ tin com-mar” 1% _nppJ'” ?inn ‘pun’ *’

in accordance with law of sh:
months 1’1-am tho .m.@…;..:

file     four weeks.

   loarnocl Ana is

"I