IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
Bail Appl No. 692 of 2007()
1. BABUKUTTAN, AGED 37,
... Petitioner
2. SARASAMMA, AGED 72 YEARS,
3. SOBHANA, AGED 40 YEARS,
4. VINITHA REGHUNATH, AGED 26 YEARS,
5. SREEDEVI, AGED 33 YEARS,
Vs
1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY
... Respondent
2. CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE,
3. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE,
For Petitioner :SRI.K.ABDUL JAWAD
For Respondent :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
The Hon'ble MR. Justice V.RAMKUMAR
Dated :21/02/2007
O R D E R
V. RAMKUMAR, J.
````````````````````````````````````````````````````
B.A. No. 692 OF 2007 B
````````````````````````````````````````````````````
Dated this the 21st day of February, 2007
O R D E R
Petitioners, who are the husband of one Sheela and first
petitioner’s mother, sister, brother’s wife and another sister respectively,
seek anticipatory bail on the allegation that the police of the Women
Cell, Kollam are at their heels at the instance of Sheela, who is alleged
to have lodged a complaint alleging the commission of non-bailable
offence.
2. Learned Public Prosecutor, on instructions, submitted that
eventhough the said Sheela, who is the wife of the first petitioner, had
lodged a complaint before the Women Cell, Kollam, the parties were
summoned to the police station only for counselling and no crime has
been registered by the Kollam East Police against the petitioners and
that the petitioners are not wanted by the said police in connection with
the allegations made in the petition. If so, the apprehension of arrest
and harassment entertained by the petitioners is unfounded. Recording
the submission made by the Public Prosecutor, this petition is closed.
(V. RAMKUMAR, JUDGE)
aks