Mandadi Rajendran vs K.Jayaraj

       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

AS.No. 182 of 1999(A)



1. MANDADI RAJENDRAN
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs

1. K.JAYARAJ
                       ...       Respondent

                For Petitioner  :SRI.P.RAMAKRISHNAN NAIR

                For Respondent  :SRI.C.P.MOHAMMED NIAS

The Hon'ble MR. Justice M.N.KRISHNAN

 Dated :/  /

 O R D E R

? IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

+AS.No. 478 of 2002()


#1. R.BABURAJAN, S/O. LATE RAMAN VAIDYAN,
                      ...  Petitioner
2. R.DEVARAJAN, S/O. DO. DO.

                        Vs



$1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE
                       ...       Respondent

2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KOTTAYAM.

3. THE TAHSILDAR, CHANGANACHERRY.

4. THE VILLAGE OFFICER, VELAVOOR

5. THE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF SURVEY AND

6. THE VELLAVOOR GRAMA PANCHAYAT,

!                For Petitioner  :SRI.MATHEW JOHN (K)

^                For Respondent  :GOVERNMENT PLEADER

*Coram
 The Hon'ble MR. Justice M.N.KRISHNAN

% Dated :20/09/2010

: O R D E R

M.N. KRISHNAN, J.

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
A.S. NO. 478 OF 2002
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Dated this the 20th day of September, 2010.

J U D G M E N T

Learned counsel for the appellant makes it clear that

he had already sent notice to the appellant and there is

no response at all. Therefore it appears that the

appellant is not eager in prosecuting the appeal. Since

the lawyer had already intimated and the client had

refused to turn up, no notice from the Court is necessary

and so the appeal is dismissed for default.

M.N. KRISHNAN, JUDGE.

ul/-

M.N. KRISHNAN, J.

= = = = = = = = = =
A.S. No. 478 OF 2002
= = = = = = = = = = =

J U D G M E N T

20th September, 2010.