High Court Patna High Court - Orders

Nitesh Singh vs State Of Bihar on 23 June, 2010

Patna High Court – Orders
Nitesh Singh vs State Of Bihar on 23 June, 2010
                    IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                Cr.Misc. No.12304 of 2010
                         NITESH SINGH SON OF SHYAM BABU SINGH
                                             Versus
                                      STATE OF BIHAR
                                           -----------

4. 23.6.2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the

offence under Sections 25(1-b)A/26/35 of the Arms Act.

The petitioner was arrested when he was sleeping in

the house of one Madho Singh and from under his pillow a loaded

country made pistol was recovered, for which he is in custody since

16.7.2009.

Considering the same, let the petitioner above named,

be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/- (Five

thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the

satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sitamarhi in Shyampur

Bhataha P.S.case No.50 of 2009, subject to the conditions (i) That

one of the bailors shall be the father/mother of the petitioner and

the other bailor will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give

an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the

petitioner. The bailor will undertake to furnish information to the

court about any change in the address of the petitioner, (ii) that the

bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court

concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar

nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court

below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of

bail on the ground of misuse, (iii) that the petitioner will give an
-2-

undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date

and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on

two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be

liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse and (iv) that the

petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do

so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled.

( Anjana Prakash, J. )

Narendra/