Gujarat High Court High Court

Appearance : vs Mr Ashish M Dagli For on 25 November, 2010

Gujarat High Court
Appearance : vs Mr Ashish M Dagli For on 25 November, 2010
Author: A.M.Kapadia,&Nbsp;Honourable Mr.Justice J.C.Upadhyaya,&Nbsp;
   Gujarat High Court Case Information System 

  
  
    

 
 
    	      
         
	    
		   Print
				          

  


	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	


 


	 

MCA/2465/2010	 2/ 2	ORDER 
 
 

	

 

IN
THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
 

 


 

MISC.CIVIL
APPLICATION  No. 2465 of 2010
 

In


 

CIVIL
APPLICATION No. 4202 of 2005
 

In


 

SPECIAL
CIVIL APPLICATION No. 12615 of 2003
 

 
 
======================================


 

CHANDRAKANT
CHIMANLAL JAISWAL 

 

Versus
 

DIVISIONAL
DIRECTOR & ANR
 

======================================
 
Appearance : 
MR
PRADEEP PATEL for Applicant 
MR ASHISH M DAGLI for
Respondents 
====================================== 

 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

CORAM
			: 
			
		
		 
			 

HONOURABLE
			MR.JUSTICE A.M.KAPADIA
		
	
	 
		 
			 

 

			
		
		 
			 

and
		
	
	 
		 
			 

 

			
		
		 
			 

HONOURABLE
			MR.JUSTICE J.C.UPADHYAYA
		
	

 

 
 


 

Date
: 05/10/2010 

 

 
 
ORAL
ORDER

(Per
: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.KAPADIA)

1 Mr.

Ashish M. Dagli, learned Advocate for the respondent No.1-Mr.
Shishodiya, Divisional Manager, Gujarat Road Transport Corporation,
Rajkot Division, Rajkot and respondent No.2 – Mr. Gajubha Chudasama,
Depot Manager, Limdi Bus Station, Limbdi, upon instructions received
from them, states that Notice dated 14.9.2010 issued against the
petitioner has been withdrawn in view of the fact that the
petitioner has already deposited the arrears of rent payable by him
to S.T. Corporation. Therefore, the said Notice is not going to be
implemented by the S.T. Corporation.

2 In
view of the aforesaid statement made by Mr. Ashish M. Dagli, learned
Advocate for the respondent Nos. 1 and 2, Mr. Pradeep J. Patel,
learned Advocate for the petitioner, upon instructions received from
the petitioner, who is personally present in the Court, does not
press this petition and seeks leave to withdraw the same.

3 Mr.

Ashish M. Dagli, learned Advocate for the respondents has no
objection if leave as prayed for is granted.

4 Hence,
leave to withdraw the petition is granted. The petition stands
disposed of as it is withdrawn with no order as to costs.

(A.M.KAPADIA,
J.)

(J.C.UPADHYAYA,
J.)

pnnair

   

Top