High Court Karnataka High Court

Amruthappa vs Ningappa Fakeerappa Jadar on 14 August, 2008

Karnataka High Court
Amruthappa vs Ningappa Fakeerappa Jadar on 14 August, 2008
Author: Ravi Malimath
IN THE HIGH COURT OF' KARNATAKA
CIRCUYI' BENCH AT DHARWAD

DATED THES THE 1413 DAY 01:' AUGUST, [I  * 

BEFORE

THE HON'Bi..E MR JUS'}'ICEA_ RAV;'zMAJgi§:AmVV 5 E  7

WRIT PETITION No.;754s/'2u._jVBY'zigsms.

1(A) Sm' 1~:'z=mUMAWA;_ W70 NINGAPFA JADAR
gk'/QF :~tAAYj,;rr-HE. comm M{AD_E"TIiE"FOLLOWiNG:

      

 absent on 16/07/2008 as

well as; an   "despite which, the mataer was

 xthe  """ " t 0f justice. Even as 921 tiate, the

 A: e 2   is absent.

   The respondents fled I.A.No.7/2005 for a

the petitioner should pay the proper stamp

pcnahy equal to ten times of the smmp duty. The

” filed f.A.No.8 fir oonfinnation of the pxooeed?@

‘4 A without payment of the stamp duty. The Court by the

r'””

‘

imgugned order directed the pctimncr to pay the stmnp duty
at 10 times its value. fiicvcd by such an

present petition is filed.

3. I have perused the

impugned order passed by

4. The is
a well cafi for my
interference has #0 pay the
stamp duty”-‘ 34 of tbs Kmnataka
Stamp Act and also iatisz; stamp

duty.

5. ” =i_<_io any azmul themtimd
oxthr. Thé'–pe%ifi6n i.–*s__tic§~{)éi{i pf merits md 'w mdmgxy

dircctedio send aocypyofthiscxdcr

sd/-»
Judge