High Court Karnataka High Court

Amruthappa vs Ningappa Fakeerappa Jadar on 14 August, 2008

Karnataka High Court
Amruthappa vs Ningappa Fakeerappa Jadar on 14 August, 2008
Author: Ravi Malimath
IN THE HIGH COURT OF' KARNATAKA
CIRCUYI' BENCH AT DHARWAD

DATED THES THE 1413 DAY 01:' AUGUST, [I  * 

BEFORE

THE HON'Bi..E MR JUS'}'ICEA_ RAV;'zMAJgi§:AmVV 5 E  7

WRIT PETITION No.;754s/'2u._jVBY'zigsms.

1(A) Sm' 1~:'z=mUMAWA;_ W70 NINGAPFA JADAR
gk'/QF :~tAAYj,;rr-HE. comm M{AD_E"TIiE"FOLLOWiNG:

      

 absent on 16/07/2008 as

well as; an   "despite which, the mataer was

 xthe  """ " t 0f justice. Even as 921 tiate, the

 A: e 2   is absent.

   The respondents fled I.A.No.7/2005 for a

the petitioner should pay the proper stamp

pcnahy equal to ten times of the smmp duty. The

” filed f.A.No.8 fir oonfinnation of the pxooeed?@

‘4 A without payment of the stamp duty. The Court by the

r'””

imgugned order directed the pctimncr to pay the stmnp duty
at 10 times its value. fiicvcd by such an

present petition is filed.

3. I have perused the

impugned order passed by

4. The is
a well cafi for my
interference has #0 pay the
stamp duty”-‘ 34 of tbs Kmnataka
Stamp Act and also iatisz; stamp

duty.

5. ” =i_<_io any azmul themtimd
oxthr. Thé'–pe%ifi6n i.–*s__tic§~{)éi{i pf merits md 'w mdmgxy

dircctedio send aocypyofthiscxdcr

sd/-»
Judge