High Court Kerala High Court

Dr.K.A. Suresh Kumar vs State Of Kerala on 4 February, 2009

Kerala High Court
Dr.K.A. Suresh Kumar vs State Of Kerala on 4 February, 2009
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 3773 of 2009(Y)


1. DR.K.A. SURESH KUMAR,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE
                       ...       Respondent

2. THE DIRECTOR OF HEALTH SERVICES,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.N.RAGHURAJ

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR

 Dated :04/02/2009

 O R D E R
                       T.R. Ramachandran Nair, J.
                    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
                         W.P.(C). No.3773/2009-Y
                    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
                 Dated this the 4th day of February, 2009

                          J U D G M E N T

The main relief sought for in this writ petition is to quash

Ext.P3, and for a direction to the respondent to reinstate the

petitioner in service in the post of the Assistant Surgeon.

2. The petitioner entered service in the post of the Assistant

Insurance Medical Officer in the State Insurance Department on

28/07/1993. He was granted leave without allowance on different

spells in accordance with the Appendix XII A of the Kerala Service

Rules. The same is evidenced by Ext.P1. Even though he sought

for an extension, that was not granted and, therefore, he submitted a

request seeking permission to rejoin duty which is evidenced by

Ext.P2 dated 05/09/2007. But surprisingly, he was issued with

Ext.P3 order by which his service was terminated with effect from

16/04/2002.

3. Aggrieved by the same, he has filed Ext.P4 under Rule 35

of the Kerala Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal)

Rules, 1960 seeking review of Ext.P3 order. Along with Ext.P4 he

W.P.(C) No.3773/2009
-:2:-

has filed a separate petition to condone the delay in filing the review

petition also.

4. Therefore, there will be a direction to the first respondent

to consider and pass orders on Ext.P4 on its merits within a period of

three months from the date of receipt of the copy of this judgment.

The writ petition is disposed of as above. No costs.

(T.R. Ramachandran Nair, Judge.)

ms