High Court Kerala High Court

A.Ayyappan vs The State Of Kerala on 22 January, 2007

Kerala High Court
A.Ayyappan vs The State Of Kerala on 22 January, 2007
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C) No. 33444 of 2006(F)


1. A.AYYAPPAN, AGED 60 YEARS,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY
                       ...       Respondent

2. THE KERALA WATER AUTHORITY,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.M.R.GOPALAKRISHNAN NAIR

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice K.K.DENESAN

 Dated :22/01/2007

 O R D E R
                                 K.K.DENESAN, J

                          -------------------------------

                          W.P.(C)NO.33444  of 2006

                          -------------------------------


                 Dated this the 22nd   day  of January, 2007



                                     JUDGMENT

Ext.P15 representation filed by the petitioner is pending with the

Managing Director of the second respondent. The petitioner is a retired

Draftsman. He feels aggrieved by the non-payment of full service

benefits consequent on the grant of higher grade. He retired from

service as early as on 30.6.2001. He was granted higher grade

benefits sometime in 1999. It appears that he is not satisfied with the

fixation of pay and consequent higher emoluments granted to him.

2. Counsel for the respondent Water Authority submits that the

petitioner can put forward a legitimate claim only if the government

order on which he places reliance on, is made applicable to the Water

Authority. It is also contended, on behalf of the respondents, that

records will have to be perused to come to a decision whether the

petitioner is eligible for the benefit as per Ext.P15.

3. In the circumstances, I am inclined to dispose of the writ

petition directing the second respondent to consider Ext.P15 with

reference to available records and pass orders, in accordance with

law, within two months from the date of receipt of a copy of the

W.P.(C)No.33444/2006 2

judgment. The order thus passed shall be communicated to the

petitioner immediately. The petitioner shall produce a copy of this

judgment before the second respondent for information and

compliance.

K.K.DENESAN, JUDGE

css/

W.P.(C)No.33444/2006 3