IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
Con.Case(C).No. 1763 of 2008(S)
1. A.B.M.TOWERS RESIDENTS ASSOCIATION (ATRA
... Petitioner
Vs
1. MINI ANTONY, (FATHER'S NAME AND
... Respondent
For Petitioner :SRI.SANTHEEP ANKARATH
For Respondent : No Appearance
The Hon'ble MR. Justice PIUS C.KURIAKOSE
Dated :30/01/2009
O R D E R
PIUS.C.KURIAKOSE J.
------------------------
C.O.C. No. 1763/2008 in W.P.(C)No.23419/2006
------------------------
Dated this the 31st day of January, 2009
JUDGMENT
In the affidavit submitted by the respondent to this
contempt of court case, the respondent has stated that certain
mistakes have crept into Annexure A order and she is willing to
pass fresh orders correcting the mistakes. I would have been
inclined to direct the respondent to pass fresh orders
immediately, but for the situation that even Annexure A1 is
under challenge before the Tribunal (Appeal No.688/2008) and
Annexure A1 is under stay. I do not think that it will be proper
or just to initiate action for contempt against the respondent in
the existing circumstances. I am sure that the respondent will
stick to the stand taken by her in the affidavit dated 27/1/2009
filed in this C.O.C. and the Tribunal, while taking decision in the
appeal, will have due regard to the said affidavit also. The
petitioner is permitted to place a copy of the affidavit dated
27/1/2009 filed by the respondent in the appeal in which the
petitioner is also a party. The Tribunal will expedite matters and
COC.No. 1763/2008 2
finally dispose of the appeal, without undue delay, since I find
that the petitioner association which represents the occupants of
a building complex which is subject matter of the contempt of
court case has been fighting it out seeking redressal of the
grievances of its members before the various authorities for a
quite long time.
The contempt of court case is dropped. The Tribunal for
Local Self Government Institutions is directed to hear and
dispose of the appeal against Annexure A1 at the earliest.
PIUS.C.KURIAKOSE,JUDGE
dpk