High Court Kerala High Court

A.J.Thomas vs State Of Kerala on 4 September, 2008

Kerala High Court
A.J.Thomas vs State Of Kerala on 4 September, 2008
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

CRL.A.No. 341 of 2007()


1. A.J.THOMAS, KARUVALLIL FINANCIAL
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY
                       ...       Respondent

2. M.S.VIJAYAKUMAR,

                For Petitioner  :SMT.S.K.DEVI

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice V.GIRI

 Dated :04/09/2008

 O R D E R
                         V.GIRI, J
                      -------------------
                     Crl.A.341/2007
                      --------------------
        Dated this the 4th day of September, 2008

                      JUDGMENT

The complainant in S.T.No.602/2003 on the files of

the Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Pathanamthitta, is the

appellant herein. The complaint was filed alleging that the

accused had committed an offence punishable under

Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The

accused had issued a cheque for an amount of Rs.64,660/-

for discharge of a liability. Cheque, when presented for

collection, was dishonoured for want of sufficient funds.

Though notice of demand had been sent, there was no

reply. Hence the complaint was filed. According to the

complainant, he was present on most of the days and the

case was posted for evidence on 4.9.2004, 28.9.2004,

21.10.2004 and 18.11.2004 to file proof affidavit.

Apparently, proof affidavit was filed and the counsel for

the appellant had entrusted the same to his junior. It

seems that the counsel was not available when the case

was called. This resulted in the acquittal of the accused

under Section 256(1) of Cr.P.C.

Crl.A.341/2007
2

2. Though served from this Court, there is no

appearance on behalf of the accused.

3. In view of the facts narrated above, and in the

facts and circumstances of the case, I am of the view

that the complainant is entitled to another chance to

prosecute the complaint.

4. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed. Order of

acquittal is set aside and the complaint is restored to file.

Court below shall further proceed with S.T.No.602/2003

in accordance with law.

Parties shall appear before the Court below on

17.11.2008.

V.GIRI,
Judge

mrcs