High Court Kerala High Court

A.K.Abdul Salam vs The State Of Kerala Represented By … on 19 March, 2008

Kerala High Court
A.K.Abdul Salam vs The State Of Kerala Represented By … on 19 March, 2008
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C) No. 8795 of 2008(V)


1. A.K.ABDUL SALAM S/O.KOCHU MUHAMMED,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. THE STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE
                       ...       Respondent

2. THE DIRECTOR OF PABCHAYATS,

3. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PAHCHAYATS,

4. THE SECRETARY,

5. SRI. RAJAGOPALAN,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.V.A.MUHAMMED

                For Respondent  :GOVERNMENT PLEADER

The Hon'ble MR. Justice V.GIRI

 Dated :19/03/2008

 O R D E R
                                V.GIRI,J.
                   =========================
                       W.P.(C)NO. 8795 OF 2008
                   =========================
                  Dated this the 19th day of March 2008

                              JUDGMENT

The writ petition has been filed by the petitioner challenging

Ext.P11 to the extent to which the 5th respondent has been given

a posting as Head Clerk in the Puthenchira Grama Panchayat and

also seeking a direction to permit the petitioner to rejoin duty as

Head Clerk in the Puthenchira Grama Panchayat and for disbursal

of salary and allowance with effect from 15.1.2008.

2. On instructions, learned Government Pleader submits

that the petitioner has not been permitted to join duty in the

Puthenchira Grama Panchayat, essentially, because he was

suspended from service. Learned counsel for the petitioner

submits that it is only after the filing of the writ petition that he

came to know that he was suspended by an order passed by the

President dated 14.1.2008. The order of suspension is without

jurisdiction, it is alleged and at any rate, it was passed on

extraneous considerations. Nevertheless, the order has been

challenged in a statutory appeal, Ext.P15 before the Director of

W.P.(C)8795/2008 2

Panchayats.

3. In the circumstances, the writ petition is disposed of

directing the second respondent to consider and pass orders on

Ext.P15 appeal, as early as possible, at any rate, within a period

of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.

A representative of the Panchayat shall also be heard before

orders are passed on Ext.P15. The Director shall, in the course of

passing such order, issue suitable directions in the matter of

posting of the petitioner and also pay and allowances of the

petitioner with effect from 15.1.2008.

A copy of the writ petition along with I.A.4061/2008 shall

be produced along with a copy of the judgment before the second

respondent.

V.GIRI, JUDGE

css/