High Court Kerala High Court

A.K.Chandran vs Superintendent Of Police on 9 April, 2010

Kerala High Court
A.K.Chandran vs Superintendent Of Police on 9 April, 2010
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 13018 of 2010(B)



1. A.K.CHANDRAN
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs

1. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE
                       ...       Respondent

                For Petitioner  :SRI.P.M.PAREETH

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR

 Dated :09/04/2010

 O R D E R
                 T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J.
                 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
                  W.P.(C). No.13018/2010-B
                 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
             Dated this the 9th day of April, 2010

                       J U D G M E N T

This writ petition is mainly filed seeking for the

following reliefs:-

               1.   A  writ    of  mandamus   or  other

          appropriate   writ,    direction   or   order

commanding the second respondent to issue

mike permission to the first petitioner in

connection with the Thiramahotsavam to be

conducted at Kavukunnathu Moyilom Bhagavathy

temple in Thrippangotur Panchayat from 18 to

21st of April, 2010 between 6 a.m and 10 p.m

so as to enable the devotees to celebrate

the Thiramahotsavam to the best of their

satisfaction.

2. A declaration to the effect that

the crime No.199/2009 and 200/2009 of

Kolavallur Police Station cannot stand in

the way of granting mike permission in

connection with the Thiramahotsavam at

Moyilam Bhavathy Temple this year.”

2. The first petitioner is the Secretary of the

Temple Committee of Kavukunnathu Moyilom Bhagavathy Temple

W.P.(C). No.13018/2010
-:2:-

situated in Thrippangotur Panchayat in Thalassery Taluk.

The second petitioner is the Convenor of the

Thiramahotsavam festival committee for the year 2010.

3. It is submitted that unless the permission for the

use of amplifiers is given, they will not be able to

conduct the festival effectively.

4. There will be a direction to the first respondent

to consider Ext.P8 application filed by the first

petitioner for mike sanction in the light of the fact that

the second respondent has returned the same already.

Appropriate orders will be passed within five days from the

date of receipt of a copy of this Judgment.

The writ petition is disposed of as above. No costs.

(T.R. Ramachandran Nair, Judge.)

ms