Loading...

A.K.G.Memorial Labour Contracts … vs Kerala State Electricity Board on 29 October, 2007

Kerala High Court
A.K.G.Memorial Labour Contracts … vs Kerala State Electricity Board on 29 October, 2007
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C) No. 29374 of 2007(V)


1. A.K.G.MEMORIAL LABOUR CONTRACTS SOCIETY
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD,
                       ...       Respondent

2. THE PROJECT MANAGER,

                For Petitioner  :SMT.A.R.PRAVITHA

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice ANTONY DOMINIC

 Dated :29/10/2007

 O R D E R
                          ANTONY DOMINIC, J.
                             --------------------------
                       W.P.(C). NO. 29374 OF 2007
                               ---------------------
                   Dated this the 29thday of October, 2007

                               J U D G M E N T

The prayer made by the petitioner in this writ petition is for payment

in terms of Ext.P1 agreement entered into between the petitioner and the

respondents for providing security guards. Petitioner claims payment in

terms of Ext.P5. However, on instruction learned counsel for the

respondents submit that in terms of Clause 6 of Ext.P1, remuneration at

the agreed rate will be paid by the respective establishment of the Board to

the Security Agency on a monthly basis on production of bills along with

detailed statement of posting of the guards. According to them, Ext.P5 is

only a consolidated bill and that too, unsupported by statement of posting

of the guards, as contemplated in Clause 6 of Ext.P1. It is also submitted

that as far as the claim for service tax is concerned, it is for the petitioner to

produce the service tax registration number and in the absence of which

the Board is not in a position to consider that claim as well.

Taking into account the submissions made by both sides, I dispose

of this writ petition making it clear that if the petitioner submits the bill as

specified by the Board in Ext.P1, the same will be considered and if any

amount is due, the payment will be made without any further delay.

ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE
vps

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

* Copy This Password *

* Type Or Paste Password Here *

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies. More Information