High Court Kerala High Court

A.K.Ismail vs State Of Kerala on 5 March, 2009

Kerala High Court
A.K.Ismail vs State Of Kerala on 5 March, 2009
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WA.No. 1075 of 2006()


1. A.K.ISMAIL, S/O.IBRAHIM,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. STATE OF KERALA,
                       ...       Respondent

2. ADDITIONAL EXCISE COMMISSIONER,

3. ASSISTANT EXCISE COMMISSIONER,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.M.RAMESH CHANDER

                For Respondent  :GOVERNMENT PLEADER

The Hon'ble MR. Justice K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR
The Hon'ble MR. Justice M.L.JOSEPH FRANCIS

 Dated :05/03/2009

 O R D E R
                        K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR &

                        M.L.JOSEPH FRANCIS, JJ.

                     -----------------------------------------

                        W.A. NO. 1075 OF 2006- C

                     -----------------------------------------

                           Dated 5th March, 2009.

                                 JUDGMENT

Balakrishnan Nair, J.

The writ petitioner is the appellant. The respondents in the Writ

Petition are the respondents herein. The appellant was the registered owner

of a jeep bearing registration No.KL/14A 6461. The said vehicle was

seized by the police, on the ground that it was carrying Indian made foreign

liquor worth Rs.1200/-. At the relevant time, the vehicle was driven by the

appellant’s son. The vehicle was handed over to the Excise Officials.

Thereupon, proceedings were initiated against the appellant for

confiscation of the vehicle. The Assistant Excise Commissioner by Ext.P1

order, ordered confiscation of the vehicle. In appeal, it was affirmed by

the Additional Commissioner of Excise, by Ext.P3 order and in revision,

by the Commissioner of Excise, by Ext.P5 order. The Writ Petition was

filed, challenging those orders. The learned Single Judge noted that there

was a Sessions Case, as S.C.No.40/1998 against the appellant and his son,

WA 1075/2006 2

arising out of the transport of foreign liquor, using the aforesaid vehicle.

Though the appellant was acquitted, his son, who drove the vehicle, was

convicted by the Sessions Court. The Sessions Court ordered confiscation

of the vehicle also.

2. It is common case that the order of the Sessions Court has become

final. In view of the said position, no relief could be granted to the

appellant/petitioner in the Writ Petition. So, the learned Single Judge

rightly dismissed the Writ Petition. In view of the facts of the case, we

cannot take a different view. Accordingly, the Writ Appeal is dismissed.

K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR, JUDGE.

M.L.JOSEPH FRANCIS, JUDGE.

nm/