High Court Kerala High Court

A.K.Nazar vs Abdul Majeed on 5 August, 2008

Kerala High Court
A.K.Nazar vs Abdul Majeed on 5 August, 2008
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 36132 of 2007(B)


1. A.K.NAZAR, THERIPPURATHPUTHEN VEEDU
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. ABDUL MAJEED, EAM HOUSE,
                       ...       Respondent

2. ARIFA,W/O. IBRAHIMKUTTY

3. ABDUL RASHEED

                For Petitioner  :SRI.B.KRISHNA MANI

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR

 Dated :05/08/2008

 O R D E R
                  M. SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR, J.
                    ------------------------------------------
                    W.P.(C) NO. 36132 OF 2007
                    ------------------------------------------
               Dated this the 5th day of August, 2008


                               JUDGMENT

Petitioner is the plaintiff and respondents the defendants in

the suit. On the death of first defendant, petitioner filed I.A.

1124 of 2005, an application to implead his legal heirs as

additional defendants and I.A. 1125 of 2005 to condone the

delay. Petitions were dismissed under Ext.P5 and P6 orders

which is challenged in this writ petition filed under Article 227

of Constitution of India.

2. Though notice were served on second and third

respondents, they did not appear. Learned counsel appearing

for petitioner was heard.

3. I.A.1124 of 2005, the application to implead legal

heirs of the first defendant was dismissed as follows:-

“Heard both sides. The suit is one for

injunction. The relief sought is against the 1st

defendant. Since the relief is against a

person the impleading petition is disallowed”

WP(C)36132/07 2

The order does not make any sense. It is not the law that in a

suit for injunction legal heirs of the deceased defendant cannot

be impleaded. Under Ext.P6 order the petition to condone the

delay was dismissed for the reason that I.A. 1124 of 2005 was

dismissed. Learned counsel appearing for petitioner submitted

that even notice to the legal heirs were not issued.

4. In such circumstances, Ext.P5 and P6 orders are

quashed. Munsiff Court, Punalur is directed to restore I.A.1124

of 2005 and I.A.1125 of 2005 to file and issue notice to the

proposed legal heirs and dispose the petitions in accordance

with law.

Writ petition is disposed of as above.

M. SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR,
JUDGE

Okb/-