High Court Kerala High Court

A.K. Stanley vs The District Medical Officer Of on 1 June, 2010

Kerala High Court
A.K. Stanley vs The District Medical Officer Of on 1 June, 2010
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 16764 of 2010(U)


1. A.K. STANLEY, HEALTH SUPERVISOR,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. THE DISTRICT MEDICAL OFFICER OF
                       ...       Respondent

2. THE MEDICAL OFFICER, PRIMARY HEALTH

3. THE SECRETARY, HOSPITAL MANAGEMENT

4. SMT.B. MANJULETHA, LAB TECHNICIAN,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.P.CHANDRASEKHAR

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice ANTONY DOMINIC

 Dated :01/06/2010

 O R D E R
                       ANTONY DOMINIC, J.
              --------------------------------------------------
                 W.P.(C) NO.16764 OF 2010 (U)
              --------------------------------------------------
              Dated this the Ist day of June, 2010

                           J U D G M E N T

Petitioner is working as Health Supervisor in Primary Health

Centre, Thrikkanapuram, Malappuram. He has been allotted a

quarter. Petitioner says that there is a designated quarter to be

allotted only to the Public Health Inspectors and that the said

quarter is now under the occupation of a Lab Technician should

be allotted to him.

2. Earlier he had a claim to that effect and he approached this

court. This court passed Ext.P9 judgment directing that the matter

shall be considered. Consequently the claim of the petitioner was

considered by the District Medical Officer and the claim has been

rejected by Ext.P10 order, stating that there is no designated

quarter as claimed by the petitioner.

3. According to the petitioner the conclusion in Ext.P10 is

incorrect. Petitioner has not produced any documents or materials

in support of his contention. The specific contention in Ext.P10 is

that there is no designated quarter. In the light of the findings in

WPC.No.16764 /2010
:2 :

Ext.P10 and in the absence of any documents produced by the

petitioner to support his claim, I do not find anything illegal in

Ext.P10 order.

Writ petition fails and is dismissed.

(ANTONY DOMINIC)
JUDGE
vi/