High Court Kerala High Court

A. Nabeesakutty vs The Shoranur Co-Op. Urban Bank Ltd on 29 May, 2008

Kerala High Court
A. Nabeesakutty vs The Shoranur Co-Op. Urban Bank Ltd on 29 May, 2008
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 15931 of 2008(V)


1. A. NABEESAKUTTY, W/O. T.K. HAMEED,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. THE SHORANUR CO-OP. URBAN BANK LTD.
                       ...       Respondent

2. THE SPECIAL SALE OFFICER,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.E.R.VENKATESWARAN

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN

 Dated :29/05/2008

 O R D E R
         Thottathil B. Radhakrishnan, J.
        ==================================
              W.P.(C)No.15931 of 2008
        ==================================
        Dated this the 29th day of May, 2008.


                     JUDGMENT

Having regard to the nature of the directions

being issued hereunder, notice to the first

respondent is dispensed with preserving its right

to move for review of this judgment, if aggrieved.

Learned senior Government Pleader takes notice for

the second respondent.

2. Petitioner availed a loan, which,

according to her, was for the purpose of setting up

an STD booth. Ext.P1 shows that the total amount

availed by her had grown to Rs.57,298/- as on 13-5-

2008 and the first respondent had obtained an

arbitration award and had initiated execution

proceedings in 2008. After arguing the matter for

quite sometime, learned counsel for the petitioner

confines his submission to a request that the

WPC15931/2008

-:2:-

petitioner belonging to the economically lower

strata of the society may be permitted to wipe off

the entire outstandings in instalments, so that she

could be saved from distress action.

3. Having considered the entire materials on

record, it is directed that if the petitioner

remits at the rate of Rs.8,000/- per month, payable

on or before the 20th of every month commencing from

June, 2008, including all accruals in the aforesaid

manner, the impugned distress action shall stand

dropped. If the petitioner fails to remit any of

the instalments as aforesaid, the benefit of this

judgment will stand recalled automatically and the

respondents will be at liberty to forthwith proceed

with distress action. It is clarified that this

judgment will not stand in the way of the first

respondent considering any request of the

petitioner for any waiver of interest or any other

benefit which may be available, in accordance with

WPC15931/2008

-:3:-

law.

Writ petition is disposed of as above.




                    Thottathil B.Radhakrishnan,
sl.                                  Judge.