High Court Kerala High Court

A.Parameswaran Pillai vs The Tahsildar on 24 March, 2010

Kerala High Court
A.Parameswaran Pillai vs The Tahsildar on 24 March, 2010
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 9906 of 2010(K)



1. A.PARAMESWARAN PILLAI
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs

1. THE TAHSILDAR,KOTTAYAM
                       ...       Respondent

                For Petitioner  :SRI.H.B.SHENOY

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR

 Dated :24/03/2010

 O R D E R
                T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J.
               --------------------------------------------
                     W.P.(C)No.9906 of 2010
               ---------------------------------------------
            Dated this the 24th day of March, 2010

                             JUDGMENT

The petitioner is the owner in possession of 8 cents of land

comprised in Survey No.149/9 in Block No.7 of Ayamanam

Village in Kottayam District. The property was originally held on

lease by petitioner’s father, late Ayyappa Menon from its then

title owner, Late Gopala Pillai. On the date of the Petitioner’s

father, late Ayyappa Menon, the said landed property devolved

on petitioner and his mother, late Saraswathi Amma. Title owner

of the land, namely, Gopala Pillai also died on 25/10/1975.

2. The claim of the petitioner and her mother was

allowed in their favour as per Ext.P1 order by the Land Tribunal.

The same will be accepted by the Civil Court as per Ext.P2. As

against the Ext.P2 judgment, an appeal as A.S.No.23 of 1991 was

filed against the same. The decree of the Trial Court is also

confirmed.

3. Thereafter, the matter between the parties have been

settled by the Lok Adalath as per Ext.P5 by the petitioner paying

an amount of Rupees one lakh. The petitioner has complied with

the same and now what is sought for is for mutation under the

W.P.(C)No.9906 of 2010
2

Transfer of Registry Rules. Ext.P7 is the copy of the application.

It is pointed out that Ext.P7 even though was forwarded by the

first respondent to the second respondent for report, and even

after the receipt of report the application is still pending as file

G2-9273/09 in the first respondent’s office. The petitioner seeks

for a direction to the first respondent to take a decision on the

same.

4. There will be a direction to the first respondent to

take a decision on Ext.P7 application for transfer of registry

pending as File No.G2-9273/09 after notice to the petitioner and

any other necessary parties within a period of two months from

the receipt of a copy of this judgment.

The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. No costs.

T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JUDGE

skj