mu...» mm-mun mwwma Mm. mwmmmwmwmmm %'lU¢.Z9§'"E1 wwmam WW §"'%».I5WsN.fi"%i5"%§é'*"*%a §"'H%,,$§"fi wfijwfifi IH!I%'KI'€§aR'€ZOURTOFK.lRN31'fiKlAT£A%££)R£' ._ mm mars 2'5: 5" any or my 2909 mm A 3. .E'.A..No.. 719/2mm 2 9 ' 33% A a mwm 5/0 A ' 1" rmca, as nmza. I more mus 5 as 1~:o.&7I23,; _ % " 9 mm t Apmum _ % a_8:x:i. xx Hams _s.m4V1~mmAmsmm " -- 55 mans =wIG'sunmm~zm mm: " A3921) mm 49 YEARS mm ARE mmnm Hr 110.614/3
, 4*’ cause
1″ smc-:-2
xx muocx
%0 aso nzsponmns
REA HLEU/S 96 O§’CPCAflAIHS’I”B-E
auwmrrmm HERE DA’£’EI):2′?.2..20w PASSED I13
‘0 s.1~ro.16326/2009 cm ‘IEIE In: a’ trim xxvz
J\DDL.CI’1’Y (‘EVIL AND SESSI®IS JUDGE, M1-\YfiI.hLI.,
KEr CUR’-“Z9; P3.’B’.’1’LY DRCREBINEE TIE SUIT
FOR ErJEC’1′!%T $1) HESNE ‘PRO!’ITS {DAHABE8} .
mrzs 33953:. comm m ran Anmsszcm f
DAY, 1’!!! COURT DELIVERED ‘PI-E mmowms:
WE
The appellant/daféndéiiat
o.s.xo.16a2a/2000 am than”..__1Ei1éasa””‘ ‘t:1}¢
mm. City civil : session}-” .tz;W.11,
Bangalaro (ecu-2o: 15% 3éni}i%AJ%’ under
Section 96 of _seg:1ng aside
the 2′: . 2 awe .
service or notice on
r§§§ande£zt»a[pia.iht;.f£a, they have not untarud
f ‘
A counsel ten:
aflaeilfifit/dcfenénnt submit: that
i: I*a!f[3¢nadO11tB filed as emit for ojoctmont and
;d.%ea an 6.11.2300. The appollarxtldefundant
enténod appoaranca and tilad.
terittnrn
utatamuntr. Thu rate of rent was Ra.9,200/–
pan. The datandam: £1106. written etatnmant an
L/M
“*”””””‘” Wwwnww Wm Im”wmnwr«oeI:r*”‘eau”».Ar”<& llwzuaflilim WWWWK Wk l'&J'fi£?h§'%si""*MJ£1""i*.§"%s4£"?m ¥"¥¥l'h$°W"'§ 5a¢'5-$753K? U!" i%.MsKWflH\l£.fi
ii
28.1.2002 and on the same day, the defendant
handed over the pouaoaaion of thy-:V.VV_j'-fifizit
schedule pxmiaoa to the p1ainti:::i'Lj""'a:i.éij:—-:._£1~:.;;*
same in aacknmtledgod by 31;; "
furthnrj submits after: m:r._':i'.t 5 tegi
was 1115:! by 'tag t1 m:– f
plaintiff/landloxgi xafn_:;é:e;1:__t.g £éc$i§oVAvvvfmonth1y
rants. The:a£or§;–….V:"_tI;-Vgg tiled a
Petition ungiaz; Siaefihiiénw ltige Kaxmtaka
mm: II;§§§*::j'%V,i$§$:;'i%faai2oo1 on the
file Banqalora City
and 1; as-tmdaxxt had deposited
rent: at far at periad
c:l.'.'__ 'all amounting to
the name has been paid to
than ._ It is furthor
V%.:–T§i:hmaitt6d. rum: em-men at 115.1, oo,ooo/-
mg: aé na.3e,192;- paid in the landlord
deposit, in all amounting to
has to he refumied by the
and thexetoxa the defendant mm.-in a
cauntax claim. It in also suiamitted that the
II
b
II
plaintitt Nani was sxminod as Pi?–1 wan
bofoxe the dafandant entered appuxanca._.._§fta::
the datsndant entered wpaaxance — ._'£::§.":,_4mc1
written statement, P!-1 did not tuzzxfiex; 4_
to: cmaauxamination.
Caunaal tax: the de£and.an;i:«.V
date am in the 4,: tag the’ %
trial court doercfegd t;m §.ui’tL__ifi’ ‘fmronii: or the
plaintiff: fox fkjgegehy rejected
the cauntgxti :31 ‘$3 “§s’a£en:1a.n,t . rm
inpuqnasfi” §i§1:§§fi3;_ the counter
It is paztimnt
to appellanstldufendant has
gr; apgfifiafiion finéfl: 02¢»: 41 Rule 2’! at
suction 152. «of CK: Making
produce documents and addaacza
klong with the applicatian, the
‘A :.:g4po1″1:anb/defendant has prodntzsd the cextified
or me No.18B/2001; tum meaipta both
‘ 22.4.1997 fast at sum of 113.50, 000/-* each:
copy of chaquaa haarim K953361671 and 061672
datad 22.4.1997 each for 3.a.5o,csooI- and ma
L
nu
H
5. The Registry is diazactad. ta trunmif;
IA-II/2008 with list of domzmentu tut} the
court torthwi th. ‘