High Court Kerala High Court

A.R. Sivadasan vs State Of Kerala on 12 February, 2009

Kerala High Court
A.R. Sivadasan vs State Of Kerala on 12 February, 2009
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 4645 of 2009(C)


1. A.R. SIVADASAN, S/O. RAVUNNI,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY
                       ...       Respondent

2. THE COMMISSIONER OF EXCISE,

3. THE ASSISTANT EXCISE COMMISSIONER,

4. THE EXCISE INSPECTOR,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.M.C.JOHN

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice ANTONY DOMINIC

 Dated :12/02/2009

 O R D E R
                       ANTONY DOMINIC, J.
                   -------------------------
                     W.P.(C.) No.4645 of 2009
             ---------------------------------
            Dated, this the 12th day of February, 2009

                            J U D G M E N T

The petitioner submits that a building belonging to him was

given on lease for housing the Excise Range Office, Kalady, and the

rent was fixed by the PWD authorities at Rs.1,475/- per month. It is

stated that the building was used for the above purpose during the

period from 22/07/1997 to 02/03/1999. It is stated that during the

said period, towards the rent itself an amount of Rs.28,596/- is

payable. It is stated that although, the respondents vacated the

premises, still the rent arrears have not been paid. Claiming

payment of this amount, the petitioner has filed Ext.P5

representation before the 2nd respondent with copy to the 3rd

respondent. Complaint in this writ petition is not only that the

arrears are not paid, but even the representation has not been

answered.

2. Taking into account these grievances of the writ

petitioner, this writ petition is disposed of that if Ext.P5 has been

received and is pending, the 3rd respondent shall consider the matter

WP(C) No.4645/2009
-2-

and pass orders thereon. This shall be done as expeditiously as

possible, at any rate, within six weeks of production of a copy of

this judgment.

3. The petitioner will produce a copy of this judgment

before the 3rd respondent for compliance.

This writ petition is disposed of as above.

(ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE)
jg