IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNA'1'AKA AT BANGALORE nnrnn mars $3 27"*nAx 0? JULY, 2009 fx_ PRESENT '"' was HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.L.MAuJuuA?§"5¥~ "
Aflfi ~.V V.
was HOfl’BLE MR.JUSTICE Ray; MALIMALE.”
W.A.NO.55O or 2bo9Ck;¢:é$Jé5£} ,_?
BE’I’in’:’EEN :
3.
A RAJESH
3/o ADINARAEANACHARI
AGED A300 35 YEAR$x _ 1′ .1,=,
R/Am NG.21 sAmYANARAxAnA}R0Ab§x,r_
NEARvE§EAfiSEI§ELY§.EOL2CE”§TA$ION
BANeALa3E §s9,¢?9= “, ‘? … APPELLANT
(By Sri: f»§’KA2vnE$:§H1Afiv.)
AND 1
mfiE’A§sxS$AnT ébfinxsszonaa
‘DODDAEALLAPUR SUB–D1VISION
»PanIUM shcx DR 3.2. AMBEBKAR RQAD
BA§aALaax;55o 001
THfi’3*g’saaaxsrnaAR
,BEVA!<¥ABA'I..LI TALUK
DISTRICT
anbssawnmaanxax
E"-__s/0 LATE MuuILINGAcHARI
AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS
R/A2 MARA&UBAGILU
BEVARAHALLI TOWN
BANaALaR2 DISTRICT
4 ADINARAIANACHARE
s/o Lama KUHILINGACHARI
AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS 'm_
R/Am MARALUBAGI£U,9EVhNAEALLI wows' V vV=_
BANGRLORE DISTRICT ; ,;;'E£$2QfiD£NT$:
(By sri : 9233233 & 9.caANGL£RA$A R333? :
Y.S.EALACHANDPA FOR C/R3; 'V_ " _ Vl_'g"~w'
SMT.ASHA M.KUfiAR Ganxummng gasp FGR R1=&'32)
waxs wax? APQSAL Tfi::2§,7u/s V4 "0? THE
KARNA$AKA amen counm new pgagxfie we saw ASIDE was
onnzn nnssan IN THE "W312 LPETITIOR 14888/2008
namnn 01/12/2oo3;_ "»' 'at. I a?
rnxs AE?E§§:C9MIk§,OH"§GR 6RDERS THIS DAY,
MANJUNAEH"J, EELi?ERE$'iHS"FGflLOWING:
fiL _ ¥z.
The for the appellant
the to dismiss the appeal as
1′;–a%2ifig’. ” ‘:2; nfructuous .
the Appeal is dismissed as
4Iéav”.i.rxg’ infructuous.
ea!’
rgaqe
salgi
1-5:535