High Court Kerala High Court

A.V.Fareeda vs Sales Tax Officer (Recovery) on 30 March, 2010

Kerala High Court
A.V.Fareeda vs Sales Tax Officer (Recovery) on 30 March, 2010
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 11059 of 2010(F)


1. A.V.FAREEDA, W/O. P.N.ALIKOYA
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. SALES TAX OFFICER (RECOVERY)
                       ...       Respondent

2. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER,SPECIAL 1

3. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER (APPEALS)

                For Petitioner  :SRI.P.K.RAMKUMAR

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON

 Dated :30/03/2010

 O R D E R
                   P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON, J
                  ---------------------------
                      W.P(C) No. 11059 of 2010-F
                 ----------------------------
              Dated this the 30th day of March, 2010.

                          J U D G M E N T

Being aggrieved of the assessment order dated 24.2.2010

passed by the second respondent in respect of the assessment year

2005-06 under the C.S.T Act, the petitioner has preferred the

statutory appeal along with interlocutory application for stay, and

they are stated as pending consideration before the third

respondent.

2. The grievance of the petitioner is that, without any

regard to the pendency of the said proceedings, the respondents

have initiated recovery proceedings invoking the provisions under

the Revenue Recovery Act, as borne by Ext.P5, which is sought to be

intercepted by this Court.

3. Heard the learned Government Pleader as well.

4. Considering the facts and circumstances, the third

respondent is directed to consider and pass appropriate orders on

the interlocutory application for stay, preferred by the petitioner

along with Ext.P4 appeal, in accordance with law, as expeditiously

W.P(C) No. 11059 of 2010-F 2

as possible, at any rate with in one month from the date of receipt

of a copy of this judgment. It is made clear that till appropriate

orders are passed on the interlocutory application for stay, all

further proceedings pursuant to Ext.P5 shall be kept in abeyance.

The Writ Petition is disposed of.

Sd/-

P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON
JUDGE

//True Copy//

P.A to Judge

ab