Posted On by &filed under High Court, Kerala High Court.


Kerala High Court
Abdul Hameed @ Ammi @ Attgoli … vs State Of Kerala on 17 June, 2010
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Bail Appl..No. 3635 of 2010()


1. ABDUL HAMEED @ AMMI @ ATTGOLI HAMEED,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. STATE OF KERALA,
                       ...       Respondent

                For Petitioner  :SRI.T.B.SHAJIMON

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MRS. Justice K.HEMA

 Dated :17/06/2010

 O R D E R
                             K.HEMA, J.
                          ------------------
                      B.A. No. 3635 of 2010
                 ------------------------------------
               Dated this the 17th day of June, 2010

                             O R D E R

Petition for bail.

2. The alleged offence is under Sections 394 of the Indian

Penal Code. According to prosecution, petitioner(A3) along with

three others committed robbery of 114 sovereigns of gold and

Rs.19,500/- from a private finance institution run by de facto

complainant on 16.01.2010.

3. Petitioner was arrested on 13.02.2010 and he is in

custody for the past 124 days. Petitioner is involved in eight

other cases and in all the cases bail is granted, it is submitted.

Learned counsel for petitioner submitted that though the offence

is only under Section 394 of the Indian Penal Code, which is

triable by a First Class Magistrate, this case was committed to the

Sessions Case and it is likely that it will take a long time for

disposal of the case.

4. This petition is strongly opposed. Learned Public

Prosecutor submitted that first accused in this crime escaped from

Kannur Central jail and he has not been apprehended so far.

B.A. No. 3635 of 2010 2

Petitioner is involved in various other similar crimes. If the

petitioner is released on bail, it is likely that he will also abscond,

it is submitted.

5. On hearing both sides, I am satisfied of the submissions

made by learned Public Prosecutor. I do not think it fit to grant

bail to petitioner at this stage. However, if the petitioner is so

advised, he may move the lower court, in case there is

considerable delay in disposal of the case.

This petition is dismissed.

K. HEMA, JUDGE

ln


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

* Copy This Password *

* Type Or Paste Password Here *

84 queries in 0.119 seconds.