High Court Kerala High Court

Abdul Jabbar vs Sub Inspector Of Police on 11 March, 2010

Kerala High Court
Abdul Jabbar vs Sub Inspector Of Police on 11 March, 2010
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Bail Appl..No. 985 of 2010()


1. ABDUL JABBAR, S/O ALIKOYA,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE,
                       ...       Respondent

2. STATE OF KERALA, REP.BY THE

                For Petitioner  :SRI.P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN

                For Respondent  :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The Hon'ble MR. Justice K.T.SANKARAN

 Dated :11/03/2010

 O R D E R
                        K.T. SANKARAN, J.
                      ---------------------------
                       B.A. No. 985 of 2010
                  ------------------------------------
               Dated this the 11th day of March, 2010


                             O R D E R

This is an application for anticipatory bail under Section 438

of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The petitioner is the accused

in Crime No. 26/2010 of Town Police Station, Kozhikode.

2. The offence alleged against the petitioner is under

Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. When the Bail Application came up for hearing on

24.02.2010, the following order was passed:

“After having heard the learned counsel

for the petitioner and the learned Public

Prosecutor, I am of the view that before

disposing of the Bail Application, an

opportunity should be given to the petitioner

to appear before the investigating officer.

Accordingly, there will be a direction to the

petitioner to appear before the investigating

officer at 9 A.M. on 04th and 5th March, 2010.

The petitioner shall produce a copy of the

order before the investigating officer.

Post on 11.03.2010.

B.A. No. 985 of 2010 2

It is submitted by the learned Public

Prosecutor that the petitioner will not be

arrested until further orders in connection with

Crime No.26/2010 of Town Police Station,

Kozhikode.

Hand over copy to both sides.”

4. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner

and the learned Public Prosecutor that the petitioner has

complied with the direction contained in the order dated

24.02.2010.

5. Taking into account the facts and circumstances of the

case, the nature of the offence and other circumstances, I am of

the view that anticipatory bail can be granted to the petitioner.

There will be a direction that in the event of the arrest of the

petitioner, the officer in charge of the police station shall release

him on bail on his executing bond for Rs.10,000/- with two

solvent sureties for the like amount to the satisfaction of the

officer concerned, subject to the following conditions:

A) The petitioner shall appear before the
investigating officer for interrogation as and
when required;

B) The petitioner shall not try to influence the
prosecution witnesses or tamper with the
evidence.

B.A. No. 985 of 2010 3

C) The petitioner shall not commit any offence or
indulge in any prejudicial activity while on bail.

D) In case of breach of any of the conditions
mentioned above, the bail shall be liable to be
cancelled.

The Bail Application is allowed to the extent indicated

above.

K.T. SANKARAN, JUDGE

ln