Abdul Khader vs Abubuakker on 23 October, 2010

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BAN

DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF OCTOBER__.:'_:'2("11'Qfl. f  _

PRESENT V 

THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE NT;K;»?AT_iL    A

ANB-..
THE HON'BLE MR.JUS'_ff(iE§ 
M.FANG16322/??;0OE3{fI$/Ty}-.. k

BETWEEN:
ABDUL '  

S/O LATE AHMED K:1_JI'_JHI," » _ 

AGED ABOUT. 431YEARS;,._   

R/AT SEENAJE HOUSE,  _ 'A 

VEERAKAMBA VILLAGE',-.._ *   '

BAN'IW'AL TALUK. . '  

D.K.DISTRICT.  - V  _  »-- ._.."_;ApPELLANT

(BY SR1.PL:ND1KA1 ISHWAR BHAT _ ADV.)
mD_:_  'V   

1.

A3333-r.;AK1:Ez§_
S/O MOIDU K’€iI\IHI BEARY

VEERAKAMBA VILLAGE,

” ” 5 1 ‘f BAi\§’I’WAL”TALUK,
‘ D..jK.’DISTR1cT.

ENOEOW INDIA INSURANCE co. LTD,

BRANCH OFFICE,
” BHAVAN COMPLEX,

O * KODIAL BAIL,

MANGALORE3.

D.K. DISTRICT. .. RESPON D ENTS

[BY SRI.G.NARAYA§\TA RAO — ADV. FOR R«~2,

rs

Out of the enhanced compensation of 32, 17,500/9- a
sum of ?1,50,000/- with proportionate
invested in the F ixecl Deposit in any
scheduled bank, in the name gjflmtirire
period of five years renewable by
liberty to him to withdraw’ it,
periodically. . i it

The remaining sum ‘ of-1 ‘vfi1th’_’.proportionate
interest shall” I the appellant,
immediatelirgj

l V V

sali

Judtié

35’/5
J’t1H§”é