High Court Kerala High Court

Abdul Razack vs The Assistant Passport Officer on 2 December, 2009

Kerala High Court
Abdul Razack vs The Assistant Passport Officer on 2 December, 2009
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 24381 of 2009(P)


1. ABDUL RAZACK,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. THE ASSISTANT PASSPORT OFFICER,
                       ...       Respondent

                For Petitioner  :SRI.K.K.MOHAMED RAVUF

                For Respondent  :T.SANJAY(BY ORDER)

The Hon'ble MR. Justice P.N.RAVINDRAN

 Dated :02/12/2009

 O R D E R
                    P.N.RAVINDRAN, J
                         -------------------
                     W.P.(C).24381/2009
                         --------------------
          Dated this the 2nd day of December, 2009

                         JUDGMENT

The petitioner is the holder of Indian passport bearing

No.Q.394824 issued on 9.9.1993 by the Passport Officer,

Kozhikode. In the said passport, the petitioner’s name is

shown as Razak. His date of birth is shown as 1971 without

the date and month being specified. Relying on Ext.P1 extract

of the school admission register and Ext.P2 identity card

issued by the Election Commission of India, the petitioner

states that his name is Abdul Razak and that his date of birth

is 14.12.1975. The petitioner submits that though he

approached the respondent to correct his name and date of

birth in the passport, the application was not entertained. In

this writ petition, the petitioner seeks a direction to the

respondent to correct his name and date of birth in the

passport.

Ext.P3 passport was valid only upto 8.9.2003.

Therefore, the petitioner will necessarily have to apply for a

fresh passport. At that stage, it will be open to him to

convince the authorities that the description of his name as

W.P.(C).24381/09
2

Razak and also the date of birth in the original of the passport

issued to him by the Regional Passport Officer, Kozhikode on

9.9.1993 is erroneous. I accordingly dispose of this writ

petition with a direction that in the event of the petitioner

applying for a fresh passport accompanied by the original of

Ext.P3 passport and documents proving the petitioner’s name,

identity and date of birth, the Passport Officer concerned shall

consider the same and take an appropriate decision in the

matter, after due enquiry in accordance with law.

P.N.RAVINDRAN,
Judge

mrcs