High Court Kerala High Court

Abdul Salam vs State Of Kerala Represented By The on 15 September, 2010

Kerala High Court
Abdul Salam vs State Of Kerala Represented By The on 15 September, 2010
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Crl.MC.No. 3806 of 2010()


1. ABDUL SALAM, S/O.YOUSUFF,
                      ...  Petitioner
2. AYISHA, W/O.YOUSUFF,

                        Vs



1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE
                       ...       Respondent

2. C.V.FOUSIYA, D/O.USMAN,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.U.K.DEVIDAS

                For Respondent  :SRI.PRINSUN PHILIP

The Hon'ble MR. Justice M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR

 Dated :15/09/2010

 O R D E R
          M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR,J.

           ---------------------------------------------
            CRL.M.C.NO.3806 OF 2010
           ---------------------------------------------
           Dated 15th          September, 2010


                          O R D E R

Petitioners are the accused and

second respondent, the de facto complainant

in crime No.77/2010 of Edacheri police

Station registered for the offences under

Sections 498A and 406 read with Section 34

of Indian Penal Code on Annexure-A FIR

based on Annexure-A5 complaint filed

before Judicial First Class Magistrate’s

Court, Vadakara and sent for investigation

under Section 156(3) of Code of Criminal

Procedure. Petition is filed under Section

482 of Code of Criminal Procedure to quash

the proceedings contending that entire

matrimonial disputes between the

petitioners and second respondent were

Crmc 3806/10
2

settled amicably and consequent to the

settlement second respondent has no grievance

against the petitioners and therefore, entire

proceedings is to be quashed.

2. Second respondent appeared through a

counsel and filed an affidavit stating that

after registration of the case on the complaint

filed by the second respondent, entire

matrimonial disputes were settled amicably and

consequent to the settlement second respondent

has no objection for quashing the proceedings.

3. Learned counsel appearing for the

petitioners, second respondent and learned

Public Prosecutor were heard.

4. Affidavit filed by the second

respondent establishes that entire matrimonial

disputes were settled amicably due to the

intervention of mediators subsequent to the

Crmc 3806/10
3

registration of the case. As held by the Apex

Court in B.S.Joshi and others v. State of

Haryana and another (2003(4) SCC 675) when

matrimonial disputes are settled amicably, it

is not in the interest of justice to stand on

technicalities and continue the prosecution.

Petition is allowed. Crime No.77/2010 of

Edacheri Police Station is quashed.

M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR,
JUDGE.

uj.