High Court Kerala High Court

Abdul Salim vs Febina N.P. on 31 January, 2011

Kerala High Court
Abdul Salim vs Febina N.P. on 31 January, 2011
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Crl.MC.No. 284 of 2011()


1. ABDUL SALIM, S/O.KUNJAMMU
                      ...  Petitioner
2. FAHTIMA, W/O.KUNJAMMU,
3. MAJEED, S/O.KUNJAMMU, VELUTHEDATH

                        Vs



1. FEBINA N.P.D/O.ABDUL RAHIMAN
                       ...       Respondent

2. THE STATE OF KERALA

3. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice THOMAS P.JOSEPH

 Dated :31/01/2011

 O R D E R
                   THOMAS P JOSEPH, J.

                  ----------------------------------------

                     Crl.M.C.No.284 of 2011

                   ---------------------------------------

               Dated this 31st day of January, 2011

                                ORDER

This petition is filed by the accused in Crime No.211 of

2010 of Kunnamangalam Police Station and C.C.No.875 of 2010

of the court of learned Judicial First Class Magistrate,

Kunnamangalam for offences punishable under Sec. 406, 498A

and 354 r/w Sec.34 of the Indian Penal Code. Case was

registered on the strength of Annexure-B, private complaint

forwarded to the police for investigation under Sec.156(3) of the

Code of Criminal Procedure. After investigation the Sub

Inspector submitted final report based on which learned

Magistrate has taken cognizance for the offences as above stated.

Petitioners seeks to quash proceedings against them in view of

settlement reached between them and respondent No.1. I have

heard learned counsel for petitioners, respondent No.1 and

learned Public Prosecutor.

2. It is submitted by learned counsel for petitioners and

respondent No.1 that pursuant to the compromise reached

between petitioners and respondent No.1, the latter is staying

with the first petitioner. Annexure-C is the affidavit sworn by the

Crl.M.C.No. 284 of 2011
-: 2 :-

first respondent. That affidavit shows that she has settled the

dispute with petitioner and that she has no objection in quashing

proceedings against them. The offence is purely personal to and

between petitioner and respondent No.1. Since the dispute is

settled between them and petitioners and respondent No.1 are

now leading a happy life it is necessary to maintain cordial

relationship between them. The chance of prosecution

succeeding in the case is bleak in view of the settlement. Hence I

am inclined to allow the petition.

Resultantly this criminal miscellaneous case is allowed.

The final report in Crime No.211 of 2010 of Kunnamangalam

Police Station, cognizance taken thereon and all proceedings in

C.C.No.875 of 2010 of the court of learned Judicial First Class

Magistrate, Kunnamangalam against petitioners are quashed.

(THOMAS P JOSEPH, JUDGE)

Sbna/-