High Court Kerala High Court

Abdul Shafeek vs State Ofkerala on 17 November, 2009

Kerala High Court
Abdul Shafeek vs State Ofkerala on 17 November, 2009
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Bail Appl..No. 6607 of 2009()


1. ABDUL SHAFEEK, AGED 22/09
                      ...  Petitioner
2. UMAIBA O.K., AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS,

                        Vs



1. STATE OFKERALA, REP. BY INSPECTOR OF
                       ...       Respondent

                For Petitioner  :SRI.T.B.SHAJIMON

                For Respondent  :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The Hon'ble MR. Justice K.T.SANKARAN

 Dated :17/11/2009

 O R D E R
                        K.T.SANKARAN, J.
               -----------------------------------------------
                      B.A. No.6607 of 2009
               ------------------------------------------------
          Dated this the 17th day of November, 2009


                               ORDER

This is an application for bail under Section 439 of the

Code of Criminal Procedure. The petitioners are accused

Nos.1 and 4 in Crime No.275 of 2009 of Kumbla Police

Station, Kasaragod District.

2. The offences alleged against the petitioners are

under Sections 366A, 376, 506(i), 417 and 109 read with

Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. The victim is a minor girl who was aged 16 years

at the relevant time. The allegation is that accused Nos.4

and 5, two ladies in the neighbourhood, took the minor girl

to several places and allowed the other accused to commit

the offence on the minor girl. The allegation against the

first accused is that he pretended love with the victim and

had committed the offence upon her.

4. The first accused was arrested on 30.9.2009.

The fourth accused was arrested on 27.9.2009. The fourth

accused is the mother of the first accused. She was

B.A. NO. 6607 OF 2009

:: 2 ::

responsible for taking the victim to several places and

providing opportunity for the other accused to commit the

offence. The fourth accused is a person involved in the sex

racket.

5. Taking into account the facts and circumstances

of the case, the duration of the judicial custody undergone

by the first petitioner (first accused) and the present stage

of investigation, I am of the view that bail can be granted to

the first petitioner on stringent conditions. At the same

time, the request for bail made by the second petitioner

(fourth accused) is liable to be rejected.

The first petitioner shall be released on bail on his

executing bond for Rs.25,000/- with two solvent sureties for

the like amount to the satisfaction of the Judicial Magistrate

of the First Class-I, Kasaragod, subject to the following

conditions:

a) The first petitioner shall report before the
investigating officer between 9 A.M. and 11 A.M. on
every Monday and Thursday, till the final report is
filed or until further orders;

b) The first petitioner shall appear before the
investigating officer for interrogation as and when
required;

B.A. NO. 6607 OF 2009

:: 3 ::

c) The first petitioner shall surrender his passport, if
any, before the court of the Judicial Magistrate of the
First Class-I, Kasaragod. If the petitioner does not
possess a passport, an affidavit to that effect shall be
filed before the learned Magistrate;

d) The first petitioner shall not try to influence the
prosecution witnesses or tamper with the evidence;

e) The first petitioner shall not commit any offence or
indulge in any prejudicial activity while on bail;

f) In case of breach of any of the conditions mentioned
above, the bail shall be liable to be cancelled.

The Bail Application is allowed in so far as it relates to

the first petitioner (first accused) in the manner indicated

above and the Bail Application is dismissed in so far as it

relates to the second petitioner (fourth accused).

(K.T.SANKARAN)
Judge

csl