High Court Kerala High Court

Abdul Shukkur vs State Of Kerala on 23 December, 2010

Kerala High Court
Abdul Shukkur vs State Of Kerala on 23 December, 2010
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Bail Appl..No. 8407 of 2010()


1. ABDUL SHUKKUR, S/O.IMBICHI BAVA,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. STATE OF KERALA,
                       ...       Respondent

                For Petitioner  :SRI.C.V.MANUVILSAN

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice V.RAMKUMAR

 Dated :23/12/2010

 O R D E R
                         V.RAMKUMAR, J.
                   ------------------------------------
               Bail Application No. 8407 of 2010
                ------------------------------------------
          Dated this the 23rd day of December, 2010

                                ORDER

Petitioner, who is the sole accused in Crime No.910/2010 of

Tirur Police Station for offences punishable under Sections 448,

427, 294(b) I.P.C., seeks anticipatory bail.

2. The learned Public Prosecutor opposed the application.

3. After evaluating the factors and parameters which

are to be taken into consideration in the light of paragraph 122

of the verdict dated 2-12-2010 of the Apex Court in

Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre v. State of Maharashtra and

Others (2010(4) KLT 930), I am of the view that anticipatory

bail cannot be granted in a case of this nature, since the

investigating officer has not had the advantage of interrogating

the petitioner. But at the same time, I am inclined to permit

the petitioner to surrender before the Investigating Officer for the

purpose of interrogation and then to have his application for bail

considered by the Magistrate or the Court having jurisdiction.

Accordingly, the petitioner shall surrender before the investigating

B.A.No.8407/2010 2

officer on 03.01.2011 or on 04.01.2011 for the purpose of

interrogation and recovery of incriminating material, if any. In

case the investigating officer is of the view that having regard to

the facts of the case arrest of the petitioner is imperative he

shall record his reasons for the arrest in the case-diary as

insisted in paragraph 129 of Siddharam Satlingappa

Mhetre’s case (supra). The petitioner shall thereafter be

produced before the Magistrate or the Court concerned and

permitted to file an application for regular bail. In case the

interrogation of the petitioner is without arresting him, the

petitioner shall thereafter appear before the Magistrate or the

Court concerned and apply for regular bail. The Magistrate or

the Court on being satisfied that the petitioner has been

interrogated by the police shall, after hearing the prosecution as

well, consider and dispose of his application for regular

bail preferably on the same date on which it is filed.

B.A.No.8407/2010 3

4. In case the petitioner while surrendering before the

Investigating Officer has deprived the investigating officer

sufficient time for interrogation, the officer shall complete the

interrogation even if it is beyond the time limit fixed as above

and submit a report to that effect to the Magistrate or the

Court concerned. Likewise, the Magistrate or the Court also will

not be bound by the time limit fixed as above if sufficient time

was not available after the production or appearance of the

petitioner.

This petition is disposed of as above.

V.RAMKUMAR, JUDGE

ln