High Court Karnataka High Court

Abdul Vahab vs Smt Dilshad on 16 February, 2010

Karnataka High Court
Abdul Vahab vs Smt Dilshad on 16 February, 2010
Author: V.Jagannathan

IN THE HIGH mom” or KARNATAKA AT u

mmn THIS THE 1672 my on FEBRU¢:§§2’d’);La–.TA

THE HOITBLE MRJU8’I1t’i=E

u,,,I3.A.1_¢g..§rz’ 5 :1

out–uh-Juan:-annou–nu-

AGED ABOUT 23Y::.:AR{s, : _

R/AT NEAR {QB A
NERONI,MARAVfA§lfTTfi€’

(BY 3121 H; s1-rarmr, mv.)

– –..~–……

1″; .

‘ AAGED 26 YEARS,
O-.fNA.?.’EER ,
R/1°51’ }oIfiLVIi’3AKA’l’I’E«, G-ULPADI GRAMA,

ORIENTAL INSURANCE co. L’I’I)..

” DIVISIONAL MANAGER,
DIVISIONAL OFFICE, UDUPI.
RESPONDEN’I”S

H {BY SR1 M. ARUN PONNAPPA, ADV. FOR R2)

-Ir’ Iufififi lhflquug ..— .—- –

E
2
1’1′
Z

§
ll-

0

‘5’:

D
O
U

9
I
‘3:

2

E
5
LL.

0

F-

M
8
U
I
9
I
§
§
M
5
LI-

3

E
3
3
J
E
2

THIS MFA IS FILED U/S 30(1) OF WC)

COMMISSIONER FOR W0RK1vt£;N”s%tJ00

TI-{IS MFA CC)h»!11*’!’§..’}’:’V~()N.”AI.?;'(‘;,)–1A7¢”‘ this DAY,

THE comm’ DELIVERED ‘I’_I{E’

questionixlg the

intcrcat 0f by the Commbsioncr

and the suI5’mjssiot1-__of~.V_tEwt”»LVappelJa.ut’a Counsel is that

:0 at 7% % from the date of
01′ order and thcrcaftcrwards at

t is made.

View of the contention put forward only an
payment of interest, I am of the View that the
order of the Commissioner requires no

modification so far as compenaatian is oonccrncd. but

lmwa-«er, the interest is made payable at 7% % from the

9.

X.’

RKBIE_}’H’S
compsnspmon ACT, AGMNST TI-IE 0
mtan 30.04.2003 PASSED 11: west: CR+.2f$f3;§{F[’20:36″ . *
ON THE FILE OF LABOUR OFFICER ‘AHI35-.’

-Jr! l\ll’|!”|”\ lIo\|up nu—- — –