Abdulsab Nannesab Totad @ … vs Sahadevappa Mallappa Suragond on 16 June, 2008

   4VC%AV{_Zi~iCHINAMATf§, ADV. ~ ABSENT)
 1 "S;_§I~lADEVAPPA MALLAPPA SURAGONS

 %.1(a) NINGAWWA w/0 SAHADEVAPPA SURAGGND

IN THE'. HIGB COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE
Dated the 169* day of June 2008 
:BEFORE: %f"" ,_,
THE I-i{)N'BLE MRJUSTICE : V.JAQ=A3S§_I§AT§§§A._N T'  ~    
REGULAR SECQND A9£%'I{éAL :~2"s;>;8_6; ;  *  

BETW EEN

1 ABDULSAB NANNEsAB5"*:*{§}r1a.§ @'JEi{Ir§'KA':1:*r;
SINCE DEAD, BY ms     

1(a) GOUSUSAB s1o";éi39u;s§A.i3'*mfrA1) %
AGE'; 55 YEARS o<:c;a.G1e*1r:U1«;1%u as _ 

(1:3) MAULA.SftB f:3/ ci:'Aa{):i3L.'3;é}3'.?1*c)f1f_é;D
MAJ_<:)R, @'<_:g::;.A§::Rz§;u1;ri:--RE ,

(c ) G0o;:)VU:m§_w)c:E{SgA13 SSHIGGAON
«AGE-.Mk3JOF$-1,  ocg:-AGRi"cULTURE 65 HOUSEHGLD

(cl)  *TaxiAK}<;:_iMsAB SHIGGAON
AGE 'B2,[£\JQR,'» jo§:'<$:;_A:}R;cUL'rUR§: an HOUSEHOLD

 -ALL ARE 1::/0 KARADAGE
~  TALUK s;=xvA._Ni1;2
 HAVERI 530 001.
' -   APPELLANTS

ALE'-ID :

V SINCE DEAD, BY HIS L.Rs

MAJOR

(b) EHARAMAPPA S,' C.) SAHADEVAPPA SURAGOND
MAJOR

 



(c) CHANNAPPA s/0 SAHADEVAPPA SRUAGOND;'"-- 
MAJOR   T

(d) SURESH S/0 SAHASEVAPPA SRUAGONSW" '  '- 'T '
MAJOR  -

ALL ARE R/O SHEELAVANT%%"SQMA'_PU I3{   
TALUK SHIGGAON     1  
ms? HAVER: 580 09;.

AGE 54 YEARS OCC:AGR{CULTURE._  -- -'
AND SERVICE}    
R/{D SHEELAVAMTH S()MA'£~'-UR 
TALUK SHIGGAGNT _    
DIST HAVER: 530 am,  2

:2. SHANKARAPPA S/O rv':A:;L.APPA"sURAc§oN:}""'~ 

3. S§DDAP'fPAaS{O MABADEV}'§P_P.A s(;rRAc;«oND
AGE  (}c_  100 CPC AGAINST THE
JUDGMENT'=A_NS.,l?}EGREE DATEZD: 15.9.2004 PASSED iN
reA.1~€f0. %..4/19910:: THE FILE OF THE CWIL JUDGE

  (SF§.[;'.N,).,V i£AVER¥;';%i;LOWiNG THE APPEAL Aim SEWING

 'ASIDE 'rHF; d_UD{}MENT AND DEGREE DATED: 2(}.8.1991

 'I?AssEi:)_ '~::sf4-.A0s.N0. 25,/1979 ON THE FILE op' THE
'--ML?NS1I?IF€';--A.SAVANUR.

'  TH.;s:}§PiDEAL COMING mt FOR HEARING THIS DAY,

  .V 'rHE"::.0'Uam DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

JUDGMENT

This matier was cailed on two occasians and on

‘4 both the ocsaslons, name appeared for the appellants

and there was also 21:?) representation. This ceurt

%

/’v

Waited for some time with the hope that the counsel far
appellants would turn up to make his submiégions.

But, it was in vain.

Hence, 11116.63? the above cireaimtstafifiés’; 2 ‘ x

stands; dismissed far non-girdsccuficn. . _ T’

eke/m _ 3
111596