IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Cr.Misc. No.28014 of 2009
Abhishak Kumar Singh, son of Upendra Kumar, resident of
Mohalla-Naya Bazar, P.S.-Tatarpur (Kotwali), District-
Bhagalpur
Versus
1. The State Of Bihar.
2. Pintu Kumar Pandey @ Pramod Kumar Pandey, resident of
Mohalla-Golgahat, P.S.-Tatarpur (Kotwali), District-
Bhagalpur.
-----------
2. 05.09.2011 The informant-petitioner has preferred this
application under Section 439 (2) of the Cr.P.C. for
cancellation of bail, which was granted to the opposite
party no.2 vide order dated 12.06.2009 passed by the
learned 3rd Additional Sessions Judge, Bhagalpur in
B.P.No.624/09.
Heard Mrs. Pravina Kumari, the learned
counsel for the petitioner and Mr. C.Jawahar, learned
counsel for the State.
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits
that after granting of the bail, the petitioner has been
threatened by the opposite party no.2 several times.
The learned counsel for the State submits that
the prayer of the petitioner cannot be considered at this
stage. The petitioner may file a petition before the trial
court, if such threatening is given.
2
After hearing the learned counsel for both the
parties, it appears that the contention of the learned
counsel for the State is correct. I do not find any ground to
interfere with the orders. However, the petitioner is at
liberty to raise his grievance, if and when such occasion
arises before the learned trial court, which shall be
considered by the learned trial court.
In the result, this application stands disposed
of.
V.K. Pandey ( Amaresh Kumar Lal, J.)