High Court Kerala High Court

Aboobacker Siddique vs State Of Kerala Through The on 15 March, 2010

Kerala High Court
Aboobacker Siddique vs State Of Kerala Through The on 15 March, 2010
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Bail Appl..No. 6237 of 2009()


1. ABOOBACKER SIDDIQUE,
                      ...  Petitioner
2. MUHAMMEDALI, S/O.HUSSAIN,

                        Vs



1. STATE OF KERALA THROUGH THE
                       ...       Respondent

                For Petitioner  :SRI.SUNNY MATHEW

                For Respondent  :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The Hon'ble MR. Justice K.T.SANKARAN

 Dated :15/03/2010

 O R D E R
                       K.T. SANKARAN, J.
                     ---------------------------
                     B.A. No. 6237 of 2009
                 ------------------------------------
              Dated this the 15th day of March, 2010

                            O R D E R

This is an application for anticipatory bail under Section 438

of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The petitioners are accused

Nos. 1 and 2 in Crime No.565/2009 of Medical College Police

Station, Kozhikode District.

2. The offences alleged against the petitioners are under

Section 353 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 20 and 21 of

the Protection of River Banks and Regulation of Removal of Sand

Act, 2001.

3. When the Bail Application came up for hearing on

02.03.2010, the following order was passed:

“After having heard the learned counsel

for the petitioners and the learned Public

Prosecutor, I am of the view that before

disposing of the Bail Application, an

opportunity should be given to the petitioners

to appear before the investigating officer.

Accordingly, there will be a direction to the

petitioners to appear before the investigating

officer at 9 A.M. on 08th and 09th March, 2010.

B.A. No. 6237 / 2009 2

The petitioners shall produce copy of the order

before the investigating officer.

Post on 15.03.2010.

It is submitted by the learned Public

Prosecutor that the petitioners will not be

arrested until further orders in connection with

Crime No.565/2009 of Medical College Police

Station, Kozhikode District.

Hand over copy to both sides.”

4. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners

and the learned Public Prosecutor that the petitioners have

complied with the direction contained in the order dated

02.03.2010.

5. Taking into account the facts and circumstances of the

case, the nature of the offence and other circumstances, I am of

the view that anticipatory bail can be granted to the petitioners.

There will be a direction that in the event of the arrest of the

petitioners, the officer in charge of the police station shall release

them on bail on their executing bond for Rs. 10,000/- each with

two solvent sureties for the like amount to the satisfaction of the

officer concerned, subject to the following conditions:

B.A. No. 6237 / 2009 3

A) The petitioners shall appear before the
investigating officer for interrogation as and when
required;

B) The petitioners shall not try to influence the
prosecution witnesses or tamper with the
evidence.

C) The petitioners shall not commit any offence or
indulge in any prejudicial activity while on bail.

D) In case of breach of any of the conditions
mentioned above, the bail shall be liable to be
cancelled.

The Bail Application is allowed to the extent indicated

above.

K.T. SANKARAN, JUDGE

ln