High Court Kerala High Court

Abraham Daniel @ Raju vs Mable Joseph on 21 June, 2010

Kerala High Court
Abraham Daniel @ Raju vs Mable Joseph on 21 June, 2010
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 17197 of 2010(R)


1. ABRAHAM DANIEL @ RAJU, AGED 44 YEARS,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. MABLE JOSEPH, AGED 39 YEARS,
                       ...       Respondent

                For Petitioner  :SRI.THYPARAMBIL THOMAS THOMAS

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice R.BASANT
The Hon'ble MRS. Justice M.C.HARI RANI

 Dated :21/06/2010

 O R D E R
               R.BASANT & M.C.HARI RANI, JJ.
                         **********************
                    W.P(C) No.17197 of 2010
                         *********************
               Dated this the 21st day of June, 2010

                             JUDGMENT

BASANT, J.

The petitioner has come to this Court with the grievance

that O.P(Divorce) No.622 of 2007 filed by him is not taken up for

disposal. Report of the learned Judge was called for. The

learned Judge reports that the O.P was once dismissed for non

prosecution. Later a restoration petition was filed and the

matter has been restored vide order dated 22.05.2010. The case

now stands posted to 22.07.2010. The learned Judge in the

report dated 16.06.2010 undertakes that the matter shall be

disposed of within a period of six months, ie. on or before

16.01.2011.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

the petitioner has to return to his place of employment abroad.

It is, in these circumstances, prayed that the evidence of the

petitioner may be directed to be recorded at the earliest.

3. It is for the petitioner to move the court below for that

relief. He must bring to the notice of the court below the date on

W.P(C) No.17197 of 2010 2

which the petitioner has to leave India in connection with his

employment. We have no reason to assume that if the petitioner

makes an application to that effect, appropriate orders shall not

be passed by the court below.

4. This Writ Petition is allowed in part with the above

observations. We accept the undertaking of the court below that

the case shall be disposed of by 22.01.2011.

5. Compliance shall be reported to this Court.

6. Hand over a copy of this judgment to the learned

counsel for the petitioner.

(R.BASANT, JUDGE)

(M.C.HARI RANI, JUDGE)
rtr/