HJTHEIHGIICOURTCHTKARNATAKA CHRCUYFBENC}1AT]HAR"UU3 DATED THIS THE "7TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 20': BEFORE THE HON'}3LE MR. JUSTICE__,A..S_.4 BQ'PAI\3'.I5Jf§.'V""' " BETWEEN: L ADAVIRAO S/O. EANDERAO, AGE. 63 YEARS, , A Occ. AGRIcULTURE.__ BALAJIRAO S/O.BAND'ERA'®'--'1'_,__ I AGE. , Occ. (BOTH ARE /O;IvILIDI,A,_RUR VILLAGE, TQ. 56 DIST"; K_OPP'AL";.. »A(IV§3'Y _SR.I . 'LA§§R1AN.T. MANTAGANI, ADV.) I. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER "LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, ..jSj~»KOPPAL. .' 'IA*i:IE'AEXECUTIVE ENGINEER, "No.1, TB. DAM DIVISION, «:9? MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL II3 /200??' ff'. ".APPELLANTS ix) MUNIRABAD. RESPONDENTS
(BY S}\/[T.MEGHA.C. KOLEKAR, I-I.C.G.P.)
MFA FILED U/S 54(1) OF LA ACT
JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 22 /01 /2090″-._PAS_SED ” IN_
LAC. NO. 158/99 ON THE FILE OF THE CIVIL”J-i’_JfDGE4_’AND ”
ADDL.CJM., KOPPAL, PARTLY ALLOWING’ TH_E’1RE:F’E;R_ENC§)
PETITION FOR ENHANCED COMPEN«SA7TION ‘AND. ySEEK.I.NQ
FURTHER ENHANCEMENT OF CQMPEN_sATIoN§’–‘.
THIS APPEAL COMING oN¢:FoR FURTHI}}3R’1’;:OI§DERSV
THIS DAY, THE COURT FOLLO.VVING:
The appellant enhancement of the market. awarded by the
Reference ciofirt I§Id’¢1’£I§dcI 22 /0 1 /2000.
2. Si1″1Ce* there “filing the appeal, the LA.
1/ 2007 is fi1ed;«-._dThe’ 1_eVa:jne:d’ Government Advocate opposes
it-l’I€y_ap[1IIf:?:afZit)}’LV_fO1’u’C0I1(iG1″1ati01’1 of delay. However, taking
note’ .Vof*V.the:”IfavCt’—that in similar appeal in M.F.A. No.
has condoned the deiay, subject to
of interest} The delay is condoned, subject to the said
°f’Cond_ition’;_«
Q’
2
-2:
G53
interest for the period of 2495 days as done in the simiiar
appeal and denied therein.
In terms of the above, the appeai stands 9
%%e; ;g&;e<,_»e
Egagfie"
hnrn/–
