Afsal vs Sub Inspector Of Police on 3 June, 2010

0
41
Kerala High Court
Afsal vs Sub Inspector Of Police on 3 June, 2010
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Crl.MC.No. 885 of 2010()


1. AFSAL, S/O.KUNHABDULLA, AGED 26 YEARS,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE,
                       ...       Respondent

2. STATE REP. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.T.G.RAJENDRAN

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice V.RAMKUMAR

 Dated :03/06/2010

 O R D E R
                      V. RAMKUMAR, J.
                    = = = = = = = = =
                  Crl.M.C. No.885 of 2010
                  = = = = = = = = = = =
                Dated: 3rd day of June, 2010

                            ORDER

Petitioner, who is the accused in Crime No. 196/2003 of

Nadapuram Police Station for an offence punishable under

Section 55(a) of the Abkari Act and whose case is now

pending before the Special Court for NDPS Cases, Vadakara

as S.C No. 531/2007, seeks a direction to the said Court to

release the petitioner on bail on the date of his surrender

itself.

2. Admittedly, non-bailable warrants of arrest are

pending against the petitioner. The circumstances under

which those non-bailable warrants of arrest came to be

issued against the petitioner are not discernible to this

Court. It is only proper that the petitioner surrenders before

the Special Court for NDPS Cases, Vadakara and seeks

regular bail.

Crl.M.C. No.885 of 2010
2

Accordingly, this Crl.M.C. is disposed of permitting the

petitioner to surrender before the Court below and file an

application for regular bail within a period of two weeks from

today. In case, the petitioner complies with the above

condition, his bail application shall be considered and

disposed of on merits preferably on the same date on which

it is filed notwithstanding the pendency of any non-bailable

warrants, if any, against him and after considering the

explanation offered by the petitioner for his previous non-

appearance and also after considering the fact that the co-

accused in the case have been acquitted after trial.

Dated this the 3rd day of June, 2010

V. RAMKUMAR,
(JUDGE)
dmb

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here