High Court Kerala High Court

Afsal vs The State Of Kerala on 11 January, 2010

Kerala High Court
Afsal vs The State Of Kerala on 11 January, 2010
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 891 of 2010(J)


1. AFSAL, AGED 16, S/O.KHADEEJA (MINOR),
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY THE
                       ...       Respondent

2. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION,

3. THE DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION,

4. THE EDARIKOD HIGH SCHOOL,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.G.SREEKUMAR (CHELUR)

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR

 Dated :11/01/2010

 O R D E R
                      T.R. Ramachandran Nair, J.
                   - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
                       W.P.(C) No. 891 of 2010-J
                   - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
              Dated this the 11th day of January, 2010.

                                 JUDGMENT

The challenge is against the result of the District level competition

held in the item Kolkali. The petitioner’s allegation is that the programme

itself was conducted in an unappropriate time and finally the team secured

A grade without first place. The 4th respondent got the first place in the

competition. Even though an appeal was filed, that was rejected by Ext.P4.

Challenging the same, this writ petition is filed.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner reiterated the grounds stated in

the appeal. It is submitted that the schedule of the programme really was

not properly done. The appellate committee rejected the contentions, finding

that there was vast difference of marks between the winning team and that

of the petitioner’s team. They did not find any ground to interfere with the

result. In a matter like this, this court will be loathe to interfere with, in

exercise of the powers under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. No

patent defects have been pointed out also.

In these circumstances, I do not find any ground to interfere with the

matter and the writ petition is dismissed.

(T.R. Ramachandran Nair, Judge.)