High Court Kerala High Court

Ahammed Kabeer vs The District Collector on 10 February, 2010

Kerala High Court
Ahammed Kabeer vs The District Collector on 10 February, 2010
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 4411 of 2010(B)


1. AHAMMED KABEER, AGED 27 YEARS,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, MALAPPURAM.
                       ...       Respondent

2. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VENGARA.

                For Petitioner  :SRI.K.K.MOHAMED RAVUF

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR

 Dated :10/02/2010

 O R D E R
                  T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J.
               ---------------------------------------
                    W.P.(C) No.4411 OF 2010
                ---------------------------------------
           Dated this the 10th day of February, 2010.


                          J U D G M E N T

The petitioner is the registered owner of a Goods Vehicle

bearing Registration No.KL 11Y 9569. It is submitted that the

above vehicle was seized by the 2nd respondent on 29.01.2010

alleging illegal transportation of river sand. It is stated that the

vehicle was not having any river sand or any sand.

2. The main prayer in the writ petition is for a direction to

the respondents to release KL 11Y 9569 Goods Vehicle to the

petitioner on interim custody.

If the petitioner moves the 1st respondent with an

application to release the vehicle by way of interim custody, the

same will be considered and appropriate orders shall be passed

within a period of seven days from the date of production of a

copy of this judgment, in the light of the well settled principles

laid down by this Court in various decisions and on such terms

and conditions as he deems fit to impose. The petitioner has got

W.P.(C) No.4411/2010 2

a case that he was having a valid pass. That aspect can be

raised by the petitioner before the District Collector and the same

will also be considered. The matter will be considered in

accordance with law. There will be a further direction to the

1st respondent to pass final orders within a period of two months

from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment with notice to

the petitioner and after considering the pleas raised by the

petitioner, on merits.

This writ petition is disposed of as above.

T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR
JUDGE

smp