Ahkam vs State Of Uttaranchal on 14 February, 2001

Last Updated on

Uttaranchal High Court
Ahkam vs State Of Uttaranchal on 14 February, 2001
Equivalent citations: 2001 CriLJ 3818
Author: M Jain
Bench: M Jain

ORDER

M.C. Jain, J.

1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A.

2. It is pointed out that no specific role has been assigned to the applicant in the F.I.R. It is also pointed out that in the statement under Section 161, Cr. P.C. Nasim stated that Lathi blow was struck on Yasin by Ikram, So far as the applicant is concerned, he may be released on bail.

3. Let the applicant Akram be released on bail in case crime No. 169/2000 under Sections 147, 148, 149, 307, 452, 336, 302, I.P.C. P.S. Kotwali Roorkee, District Haridwar on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the C.J.M., Haridwar.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes:

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

* Copy This Password *

* Type Or Paste Password Here *