Gujarat High Court High Court

Ahmedabad vs Dashrathbhai on 7 September, 2010

Gujarat High Court
Ahmedabad vs Dashrathbhai on 7 September, 2010
Author: A.M.Kapadia,&Nbsp;Honourable Mr.Justice J.C.Upadhyaya,&Nbsp;
   Gujarat High Court Case Information System 

  
  
    

 
 
    	      
         
	    
		   Print
				          

  


	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	


 


	 

FA/1132/2000	 2/ 2	JUDGMENT 
 
 

	

 

IN
THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
 

 


 

FIRST
APPEAL No. 1132 of 2000
 

To


 

FIRST
APPEAL No. 1140 of 2000
 

  
 
For
Approval and Signature:
 

  
 
HONOURABLE
MR.JUSTICE A.M.KAPADIA
 

  
HONOURABLE
MR.JUSTICE J.C.UPADHYAYA
 

 
=========================================================

1

Whether
Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?

2

To be
referred to the Reporter or not ?

3

Whether
their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgment ?

4

Whether
this case involves a substantial question of law as to the
interpretation of the constitution of India, 1950 or any order
made thereunder ?

5

Whether
it is to be circulated to the civil judge ?

=========================================================

AHMEDABAD
MUNICIPAL CORPORATION – Appellant(s)

Versus

DASHRATHBHAI
G PATEL – Defendant(s)

=========================================================

Appearance
:

MR
MG NAGARKAR for
Appellant(s) : 1,
RULE SERVED BY DS for Defendant(s) :
1,
=========================================================

CORAM
:

HONOURABLE
MR.JUSTICE A.M.KAPADIA

and

HONOURABLE
MR.JUSTICE J.C.UPADHYAYA

Date
: 07/09/2010

ORAL
COMMON JUDGMENT :

(Per
: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.KAPADIA)

Though
the respondents in each appeal are duly served by the direct
service, they have elected not to remain present before the Court.

At
the time of hearing of the appeals, Mr. M.G. Nagarkar, learned
advocate for the appellant – Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation,
upon written instructions received from it, seeks leave to withdraw
instant batch of nine appeals unconditionally as the matters have
been amicably settled between the parties under the Tax Benefit
Scheme.

Leave,
as prayed for, is granted.

Resultantly,
all the above numbered appeals stand disposed of as withdrawn.

(A.M.

Kapadia,J)

(J.C.

Upadhyaya,J)

*
Pansala.

   

Top