Gujarat High Court High Court

Ajabsinh vs State on 30 June, 2008

Gujarat High Court
Ajabsinh vs State on 30 June, 2008
Bench: Abhilasha Kumari
  
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	

 
 


	 

SCA/5866/2008	 2/ 2	ORDER 
 
 

	

 

IN
THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
 

 


 

SPECIAL
CIVIL APPLICATION No. 5866 of 2008
 

With


 

CIVIL
APPLICATION No. 6766 of 2008
 

 


 

=========================================================

 

AJABSINH
BALUSINH RATHOD & 10 - Petitioner(s)
 

Versus
 

STATE
OF GUJARAT & 6 - Respondent(s)
 

=========================================================
 
Appearance
: 
MR
MEHUL S SHAH for
Petitioner(s) : 1 ý  11.                                      MR
SURESH M SHAH for Petitioner(s) : 1 - 11. 
MR JK SHAH ASSISTANT
GOVERNMENT PLEADER for Respondent(s) : 1, 
NOTICE NOT RECD BACK for
Respondent(s) : 1,5 - 6. 
NOTICE SERVED for Respondent(s) : 2 -
4. 
MR VIBHUTI NANAVATI for Respondent(s) : 3 - 4,
7, 
=========================================================


 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

CORAM
			: 
			
		
		 
			 

HON'BLE
			SMT. JUSTICE ABHILASHA KUMARI
		
	

 

	  
Date : 30/06/2008 

 

 
ORAL
ORDER

1. Mr.

Mehul Shah, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. Vibhuti
Nanavati, learned counsel for the respondents nos. 3, 4 and 7, have
jointly submitted that the interest of justice would be met, if this
Court issues a direction to the respondent no. 1 to hear and decide
Revision Application No. 12 of 2007, filed by the petitioners within
a time bound period.

2. Mr.

J.K. Shah, learned Assistant Government Pleader, for the respondents
nos. 1 and 2, has no objection to this request.

3. Accordingly,
it is directed that the respondent no. 1 may hear and decide Revision
Application No. 12 of 2007 and pass appropriate order, in accordance
with law, on or before 15th October, 2008. Till such time,
as the order in the Revision Application is not rendered, the
ad-interim relief granted by this Court vide order dated 4th
April, 2008, in terms of paragraph 8[d] of the petition, shall
continue. Needless to say, the parties shall co-operate in the
hearing and not to take unnecessary adjournments. It is made clear
that this order has not been passed on the merits of the case.

4. The
petition is disposed of in the above terms.

In
view of the disposal of the petition, the Civil Application No. 6776
of 2008, does not survive and is disposed of, accordingly. Notice is
discharged.

Direct
Service is permitted.

[Smt.

Abhilasha Kumari, J.]

/phalguni/