IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No. 1824 of 2011
Akash Kumar ......Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand ...... Opposite Party
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP KUMAR
For the Petitioner : Mr. Binod Kumar, Adv.
For the State : A.P.P.
02/26.04.2011
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for
the State.
This is an application for grant of regular bail to the petitioner for
the offence under Sections 420/468/471/506/34 of the Indian Penal
Code.
It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner
introduced the complainant in search of Job to Nitesh Kumar and Nitesh
Kumar promised the complainant for the employment in the Railway
Department for the Post of Ticket Collector on the demand of Rs.
5,00,000/ (Rs. Five Lakh Only). It is stated that altogether complainant
has paid Rs. 3,94,000/ in the installments to Nitesh Kumar, but when the
complainant could not be employed then he demanded the same.
Petitioner is in custody since 30.07.2010.
Learned counsel for the State opposed the prayer for bail.
Under the facts and circumstances of the case, since there is no
allegation against this petitioner that he had taken the money from the
complainant except this that he introduced the complainant to the main
accused, hence, petitioner, above named, is directed to be released on bail
on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two
sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial
Magistrate, Bokaro in connection with B. S. City P. S. Case No. 88 of 2010
corresponding to G. R. Case No. 310 of 2010, subject to the condition that
bailers would be the local residents having property within the jurisdiction
of the court.
(Pradeep Kumar, J.)
Kamlesh/