IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
W.P. (S) No. 4960 of 2011
Akhileshwar Prasad … … … … … … Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand and others … … … Respondents
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE D. N. PATEL
For the Petitioner: Mr. Ayush Aditya
For the Respondents: J.C. To S.C.III
th
03/Dated: 16 November, 2011
1) Counsel for the petitioner submitted that suffice it will be for
disposal of this writ petition, if a direction is given to respondent No. 4, to
treat this writ petition as a representation and decide the grievances
ventilated in this writ petition, in accordance with law, within stipulated
time, as given by this Court.
2) I have heard counsel for the respondents, who has submitted that
they have no much objection, if such a direction is given to respondent
no. 4 to treat this writ petition as a representation and decide the
grievances ventilated in this writ petition in accordance with law, within
the stipulated time, as given by this Court.
3) In view of these submissions, I hereby, direct respondent no. 4 – the
Superintending Engineer, Building Construction Department, Building
Circle Hazaribagh, to treat this writ petition as a representation and
decide the grievances ventilated in this petition , in accordance with law,
rules, regulations, policies and Government enforceable orders, applicable
to the petitioner as expeditiously as possible and practicable, preferably
within a period of twelve weeks, from the date of receipt of a copy of an
order of this Court, after giving an adequate opportunity of being heard
to the petitioner or to his representatives. If the amount is found legally
payable to the petitioner, the same will be paid within a further period of
four weeks thereafter. While disposing of the matter, the respondent no.4
will also keep in mind annexure5 to this memo of petition which is a
letter dated 27.5.2011 issued by the Deputy Secretary, Road Construction
Department, Govt of Jharkhand.
4) In view of the above directions, this writ petition is disposed of.
Manoj/cp.2 (D. N. Patel, J)